-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Fri, 25 Oct 2002, Matt Kettler wrote:
> I took the first message in this, removed the spammotel banner HTML and the > SpamAssassin markups and ran in through 2.43. Are you running SpamAssassin > with all the DNSBLs turned off? Yes, my ISP does RBL checking, but it I didn't receive _this_ email thorugh _this_ ISP's mail server. > As for the razor report, it's usually advised to report unmunged emails, > this email has clearly been munged by spammotel. You also may not yet have > a sufficient trust rating to cause a email to be listed in razor2 based > only on your single submission. So I should better not report anything with a spammotel banner to razor, right? Will the banner prevent SA to detect spam report to razor correctly, will the banner (plus header rewriting by spammotel) any other rule? Finally, is someone else using spammotel? (The service is not bad at all as you can create an email account fairly quick) -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: pgpenvelope 2.10.2 - http://pgpenvelope.sourceforge.net/ iD8DBQE9um/UY6Nk2Nv6ZRcRAomsAKCRCzLU0Fzrt7Sqee5jungPEBfEAQCfapt1 nxqgRnXHp9n/cDTr/RCZF3M= =4kED -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: ApacheCon, November 18-21 in Las Vegas (supported by COMDEX), the only Apache event to be fully supported by the ASF. http://www.apachecon.com _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
