On Thu, 2003-01-16 at 16:26, Ross Vandegrift wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 16, 2003 at 09:40:00AM +, Ian MacDougall wrote:
> > We have a similar structure, but for reasons I won't go into we have SA
> > behind our primary mailservers.
>
> Actually, would you mind going into this? It seems really stran
On Thu, Jan 16, 2003 at 09:40:00AM +, Ian MacDougall wrote:
> We have a similar structure, but for reasons I won't go into we have SA
> behind our primary mailservers.
Actually, would you mind going into this? It seems really strange to do
it this way, but I'm sur eyou have reasons. I'd be i
>>> "Stephane" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 01/15/03 05:42PM >>>
>Hello again,
>Our infrastructure would look like:
>Internet-->[SA]-->[Mailsweeper]-->[SMTP/Lotus Notes gateway]-->Lotus Notes Mail
>reader on Client PC
>Each bracketed text is a separate server, so SA would be a dedicated relay, with no
>l
Well I'll try not to top post and unleash the dogs! :)
> However I couldn't find any description of a
> successful implementation with a similar setup than ours -- I
> would guess at least a few other companies must follow the same model.
I'm in the process of going live with the standard:
[fi
> From: "Stephane" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>
> I think most companies are afraid of implementing opensource software as a
> component for an important service such as email. I think that generally
> even though people know email has not been designed to be a 100% reliable
> protocol they still make
On Wed, 2003-01-15 at 22:42, Stephane wrote:
> Amongst the answers to my previous post ("has a large company implemented SA") there
>was a very good idea on success stories with SA... It is true that most of the people
>on the net who would say they were happy with SA and that it worked well for
On Thu, 16 Jan 2003 the voices made Martin Schroeder write:
MS> [Please limit your line length to <=70 chars/line]
MS>
MS> On 2003-01-15 22:42:07 -, Stephane wrote:
MS> > exists today disappears ? With opensource you cannot have a
MS> > contractual engagement to provide support or updates, nor
[Please limit your line length to <=70 chars/line]
On 2003-01-15 22:42:07 -, Stephane wrote:
> exists today disappears ? With opensource you cannot have a
> contractual engagement to provide support or updates, nor can
> you really know the roadmap for a product and what is planned
> for futur
On 15 Jan 2003 22:42:07 -
"Stephane" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The goal for us is to tag emails (X-Spam-Flag) in a first step
> and let the Notes client put tagged msgs into a separate folder (only saves
> time, bandwidth and storage are still used).
I think there might be a problem with
; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, January 15, 2003 2:42 PM
Subject: [SAtalk] success stories with SA ?
I think most companies are afraid of implementing opensource software as a
component for an important service such as email. I think that generally
e
On Wed, Jan 15, 2003 at 05:13:26PM -0600, Jeremy Turner wrote:
> Easy enough. I have my settings to not clobber HTML emails, and put
> reports in the header. I use an MTA-level subject rewrite so that
> emails within a certain spam range get classified as 'Yellow' or 'Red'.
> Therefore, a spam
On Wed, Jan 15, 2003 at 10:42:07PM -, Stephane wrote:
> Hello again,
>
> Amongst the answers to my previous post ("has a large company implemented SA") there
>was a very good idea on success stories with SA... It is true that most of the people
>on the net who would say they were happy with
Replies within:
Stephane wrote:
Hello again,
Amongst the answers to my previous post ("has a large company implemented SA") there was a very good idea on success stories with SA... It is true that most of the people on the net who would say they were happy with SA and that it worked well fo
> Our infrastructure would look like:
> Internet-->[SA]-->[Mailsweeper]-->[SMTP/Lotus Notes
> gateway]-->Lotus Notes Mail reader on Client PC
Our is:
Internet-->[postfix gateway]-->[SA+amavisd-new]-->[Exchange]
20k-30k emails a day, not a huge site.
In order to tag mail flowing through, I use
Stephane,
On 15 Jan 2003, Stephane wrote:
> I think most companies are afraid of implementing opensource software as
> a component for an important service such as email. I think that
> generally even though people know email has not been designed to be a
> 100% reliable protocol they still make
l Message-
> From: Stephane [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, January 15, 2003 3:42 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [SAtalk] success stories with SA ?
>
>
> Hello again,
>
> Amongst the answers to my previous post ("has a large company
>
On Wed, 2003-01-15 at 16:42, Stephane wrote:
> Our infrastructure would look like:
> Internet-->[SA]-->[Mailsweeper]-->[SMTP/Lotus Notes gateway]-->Lotus
> Notes Mail reader on Client PC
> Each bracketed text is a separate server, so SA would be a dedicated
> relay, with no local mailboxes, just a
Hello again,
Amongst the answers to my previous post ("has a large company implemented SA") there
was a very good idea on success stories with SA... It is true that most of the people
on the net who would say they were happy with SA and that it worked well for them are
using it for their privat
18 matches
Mail list logo
