Re: [SAtalk] suid and spamc

2004-01-31 Thread Keith Olmstead
Thanks for the help and reply, but I still am unable to run spamc without having the SUID bit set. I created a user and group spamd and added the following to my start scipt: spamd -d -a -c -u spamd -D and still nothing. I put the nessary files in /etc/mail/spamassassin and changed ownership

Re: [SAtalk] suid and spamc

2004-01-26 Thread Alex S Moore
On Mon, 26 Jan 2004 10:31:58 -0600 (CST) Keith Olmstead <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello, > > I hope someone can help me out. I have searched though the archives, and > did not find my anwser. I am running 2.63 with sendmail 8.12.11 and > procmail 3.22 on Solaris 9. From what information tha

Re: [SAtalk] suid and spamc

2004-01-26 Thread Matthias Fuhrmann
On Mon, 26 Jan 2004, Keith Olmstead wrote: [...] > Jan 26 10:20:29 testserver.server.net spamd[623]: debug: bayes: no dbs > present, cannot scan: /.spamassassin/bayes_toks Jan 26 10:20:29 > testserver.server.net spamd[623]: debug: Score set 1 chosen. Jan 26 > 10:20:29 testserver.server.net spamd[6

[SAtalk] suid and spamc

2004-01-26 Thread Keith Olmstead
Hello, I hope someone can help me out. I have searched though the archives, and did not find my anwser. I am running 2.63 with sendmail 8.12.11 and procmail 3.22 on Solaris 9. From what information that I have gathered, my user can not run spamc with out the spamc binary having suid bit. He