Re: [SAtalk] USER IN WHITELIST spammer scam

2003-08-14 Thread Greg Webster
>At 10:58 AM 8/14/2003 -0700, Greg Webster wrote: >>'[EMAIL PROTECTED]' is not in our whitelist, and neither is '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' or >>any variant. >> >>It appears that there is a problem with the USER_IN_WHITELIST regexp >to>me, but I may be mistaken. I can't think of any other way that this >>w

Re: [SAtalk] USER IN WHITELIST spammer scam

2003-08-14 Thread Ryan Moore
We get alot (well, used to) of spam that has forged from/return-path headers. Whitelisting like that isn't really the most effective really. One thing you could do is that if you have a DNSRBL system setup for internal use is that you could add the smtp servers that your users use to that DNSRB

Re: [SAtalk] USER IN WHITELIST spammer scam

2003-08-14 Thread Matt Kettler
At 01:17 PM 8/14/2003 -0700, Greg Webster wrote: How so? The spammer is 'From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]' and 'To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]' is a user inside our domain. Yes, we have [EMAIL PROTECTED] whitelisted, but not [EMAIL PROTECTED] I'm boggled here...how is the Return-Path getting our local user ('[EMAIL

Re: [SAtalk] USER IN WHITELIST spammer scam

2003-08-14 Thread Greg Webster
Thanks, it is. What I'm wondering now is how the local user's address is in the Return-Path header. Unless the spammer is forging the Return-Path header (making it the same as the recipient), in which case we can't really trust the Return-Path header at all for whitelisting. Greg On Thu, 14 Aug

Re: [SAtalk] USER IN WHITELIST spammer scam

2003-08-14 Thread Matt Kettler
At 10:58 AM 8/14/2003 -0700, Greg Webster wrote: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' is not in our whitelist, and neither is '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' or any variant. It appears that there is a problem with the USER_IN_WHITELIST regexp to me, but I may be mistaken. I can't think of any other way that this would have mad

[SAtalk] USER IN WHITELIST spammer scam

2003-08-14 Thread Greg Webster
Hi all, Here is the headers from a recent spam that got through (addresses changed to protect them): Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: by intouch.ca (Postfix, from userid 1002) id 282772092; Thu, 14 Aug 2003 10:40:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: from 192

Re: [SAtalk] user in whitelist

2003-06-27 Thread Matt Kettler
At 12:55 PM 6/27/03 +0200, Holger Glaess wrote: please help some users got mails with this score but i dident allow user_prefs or whitelists (only a central config where only root have access.) USER_IN_WHITELIST (-100.0 points)From: address is in the user's white-list i have no idea to change

[SAtalk] user in whitelist

2003-06-27 Thread Holger Glaess
please help some users got mails with this score but i dident allow user_prefs or whitelists (only a central config where only root have access.) USER_IN_WHITELIST (-100.0 points)From: address is in the user's white-list i have no idea to change this . can somebody help holger