Re: [SAtalk] user_prefs configuration

2003-08-14 Thread Bob Apthorpe
Hi, On Tue, 12 Aug 2003 17:10:15 -0500 Mike Grau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > on 08/12/2003 02:07 PM Bob Apthorpe wrote: > > > > > Has someone explained to him what a horrible idea this is? Spam is usually > > forged to look like it came from a non-existant or innocent address and > > bouncing

[SAtalk] user_prefs configuration

2003-08-14 Thread Scott Fraser
Good Morning Folks, Well, after fighting with it longer than I care to admit, I do believe I now have a working Postfix/SpamAssassin/Amavisd system. What I am trying to do now, is configure the system wide (and eventually on a per user basis) a way to bounce mail. Currently email that is spa

Re: [SAtalk] user_prefs configuration

2003-08-14 Thread Matt Kettler
At 10:49 AM 8/12/2003 -0700, Scott Fraser wrote: Good Morning Folks, Well, after fighting with it longer than I care to admit, I do believe I now have a working Postfix/SpamAssassin/Amavisd system. What I am trying to do now, is configure the system wide (and eventually on a per user basis

Re: [SAtalk] user_prefs configuration

2003-08-14 Thread Ryan Moore
We use amavisd-new with SQL preferences with user policies setup so that the user can specify if they want mail to be rejected/tagged. The hard part was writing the php interface to allow the user to change their preferences. All of our users are virtual though, they only exist in sql, so it wa

RE: [SAtalk] user_prefs configuration

2003-08-14 Thread Larry Gilson
>-Original Message- >From: Bob Apthorpe >Most spamware doesn't expect a multiline banner and can't deliver to >mailservers that use them. Basically, this will stop RFC non-compliant >mailers in their tracks. The legal stuff is just for show but it's >helpful to unambiguously post your po

RE: [SAtalk] user_prefs configuration

2003-08-14 Thread Larry Gilson
>-Original Message- >From: Bob Apthorpe >smtpd_banner = $myhostname ESMTP $mail_name\n > By sending mail to this server, you agree to abide by the terms\n > and conditions set forth on http://www.example.com/aup/\n > Do not send unsolicited bulk mail to this server.\n >

Re: [SAtalk] user_prefs configuration

2003-08-14 Thread Yorkshire Dave
On Tue, 2003-08-12 at 20:07, Bob Apthorpe wrote: > On Tue, 12 Aug 2003, Scott Fraser wrote: > > > Good Morning Folks, > > Well, after fighting with it longer than I care to admit, I do believe > > I now have a working Postfix/SpamAssassin/Amavisd system. What I am > > trying to do now, is conf

Re: [SAtalk] user_prefs configuration

2003-08-14 Thread Mike Grau
on 08/12/2003 02:07 PM Bob Apthorpe wrote: Has someone explained to him what a horrible idea this is? Spam is usually forged to look like it came from a non-existant or innocent address and bouncing the spam just adds to network burden and implicit denial-of-service attacks on those whose addresse

Re: [SAtalk] user_prefs configuration

2003-08-14 Thread Bob Apthorpe
On Tue, 12 Aug 2003, Scott Fraser wrote: > Good Morning Folks, > Well, after fighting with it longer than I care to admit, I do believe > I now have a working Postfix/SpamAssassin/Amavisd system. What I am > trying to do now, is configure the system wide (and eventually on a per > user basi

Re: [SAtalk] user_prefs configuration

2003-08-14 Thread Bob Apthorpe
On Wed, 13 Aug 2003 08:42:46 -0400 Larry Gilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >-Original Message- > >From: Bob Apthorpe > > >smtpd_banner = $myhostname ESMTP $mail_name\n > > By sending mail to this server, you agree to abide by the terms\n > > and conditions set forth on http://ww

Re: [SAtalk] user_prefs configuration

2003-08-14 Thread Fred I-IS.COM
be changed.. Frederic Tarasevicius Internet Information Services, Inc. - Original Message - From: "Bob Apthorpe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, August 13, 2003 10:02 AM Subject: Re: [SAtalk] user_prefs configuration > On Wed, 13 Aug 2003