It would help if the spam report that's generated clearly identified
the host that added it. If that header included something like:
Scanned for spam by host mail.small-web-host.com (172.17.2.3)
I also *LOVE* that idea, but for another reason. I like to know which
machines in the farm scanned
At Wed Jun 4 21:10:01 2003, Justin Mason wrote:
> - They go to the URL in the mail -- http://SpamAssassin.org/tag/ --
> this page tells them to ask their ISP. So they do, and the ISP
> says "we don't run that" -- because the *web host*, not the ISP,
> is running it, and they don't
On Thu, Jun 05, 2003 at 01:51:43AM -0700, Alan Leghart wrote:
> YMMV. Hopefully your changes will relieve some of the "I'm the president"
> posts.
As we seem to have established the OP as a spammer/troll, should we report
them to Razor et al as well as our Bayes DB's?
Regards: Jim Ford
-
Alan Leghart said:
> --On Wednesday, June 4, 2003 1:10 PM -0700 Justin Mason <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
> > Listen folks -- you are all too conspiracy-minded here.
> >
>
> > The last few people who've mailed here, have fit this profile. I know,
> > because I've followed up on it.
> >
> >
the
way to mexico! :)
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 4:10 PM
> To: 'Spamassassin-Talk (E-mail)'
> Subject: Enough with the conspiracy theories! (was Re: [SAtalk] (no
> subject))
>
>
&g
Peter P. Benac said:
> Ya'll need to realize that this crap is coming from the very people Spam
> Assassin was designed to block - THE SPAMMER.
> Think people Spam Assassin doesn't just appear on a PC. It needs to be
> installed. Perl needs to be installed, a Mail Transfer Agent needs to be
> In
