RE: [SAtalk] [RD] spammer reactions to antidrug (humorous)

2004-01-31 Thread Gary Schrock
From: Brian Godette [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, January 30, 2004 12:05 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [SAtalk] [RD] spammer reactions to antidrug (humorous) Maybe they'll start writting in Middle English to target that untapped market of english lit majors/grads. On Frida

Re: [SAtalk] [RD] spammer reactions to antidrug (humorous)

2004-01-31 Thread scion+spamas
From: Jonathan Nichols <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2004 10:10:43 -0800 >Some of these spams are *so* mixed up that I have absolutely no idea >what they're even trying to hawk in the first place. It might as well be >written in Klingon. I just put up a private webmail for our clients.

RE: [SAtalk] [RD] spammer reactions to antidrug (humorous)

2004-01-31 Thread Sloan, Craig
>Tihs is bcuseae the huamn mnid deos not raed ervey >lteter by istlef, but the wrod as a wlohe. >amzanig huh? -Original Message- From: Brian Godette [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, January 30, 2004 12:05 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [SAtalk] [RD] spammer reactions t

Re: [SAtalk] [RD] spammer reactions to antidrug (humorous)

2004-01-30 Thread Matthew Cline
On Friday 30 January 2004 05:52 pm, Kelson Vibber wrote: > At 09:04 AM 1/30/2004, Brian Godette wrote: > >Maybe they'll start writting in Middle English to target that untapped > > market of english lit majors/grads. > > I can just see it: > > "Whan thou wouldst gaine the favour of a lass > Thy Pr

Re: [SAtalk] [RD] spammer reactions to antidrug (humorous)

2004-01-30 Thread Jonathan Nichols
Chris Santerre wrote: -Original Message- From: Matt Kettler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, January 30, 2004 10:55 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [SAtalk] [RD] spammer reactions to antidrug (humorous) Today I got an interesting form of obfuscation, apparently to avoid antidrug.

Re: [SAtalk] [RD] spammer reactions to antidrug (humorous)

2004-01-30 Thread Kelson Vibber
At 09:04 AM 1/30/2004, Brian Godette wrote: Maybe they'll start writting in Middle English to target that untapped market of english lit majors/grads. I can just see it: "Whan thou wouldst gaine the favour of a lass Thy Prowess shold be paramount to last Wende thy way to phisik of our Druggers And

Re: [SAtalk] [RD] spammer reactions to antidrug (humorous)

2004-01-30 Thread Brian Godette
Maybe they'll start writting in Middle English to target that untapped market of english lit majors/grads. On Friday 30 January 2004 08:55 am, Matt Kettler wrote: > Today I got an interesting form of obfuscation, apparently to avoid > antidrug.cf. > > I'm not sure wether to bother with adding rul

RE: [SAtalk] [RD] spammer reactions to antidrug (humorous)

2004-01-30 Thread Chris Santerre
> -Original Message- > From: Matt Kettler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, January 30, 2004 10:55 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [SAtalk] [RD] spammer reactions to antidrug (humorous) > > > Today I got an interesting form of obfuscation, apparently to avoid > antidrug.c