-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Matt Kettler writes:
>Spamcop was historically a "donation required" service, and that status
>kept it out of the default test set. Spamcop now is merely a "donations
>accepted" service, so I suspect it will eventually work it's way into the
>test
On Tue, Nov 04, 2003 at 02:55:43PM -0500, Steve Heggood wrote:
> Could someone recommend a set of blaclists used in
> sendmail.mc that are producing good results?
CBL (cbl.abuseat.org)
SPEWS (l1.spews.dnsbl.sorbs.net)
Sorbs (dnsbl.sorbs.net)
SBL (sbl.spamhaus.org)
Blacholes (blackholes.easynet.nl
At 11:23 AM 11/5/2003, Tom Meunier wrote:
Matt, thanks for this. It's a great resource. However, I'm wondering
why the following were scored as zero and thus don't have numbers to
support their efficacy or lack thereof:
0.000 0. 0.0.500 0.110.00 RCVD_IN_SORBS_BLOCK
0.00
_BL_SPAMCOP_NET
-tom
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of Matt Kettler
> Sent: Tuesday, November 04, 2003 3:19 PM
> To: Steve Heggood; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [SAtalk] Best Blacklists
>
>
>
At 02:55 PM 11/4/2003, Steve Heggood wrote:
Could someone recommend a set of blaclists used in
sendmail.mc that are producing good results?
Might I suggest looking at the STATISTICS-set1.txt that comes with SA? This
will give you the results of testing against 343k spam messages and 151k
nonspam
At 11/4/03 11:55 AM , Steve Heggood wrote:
Could someone recommend a set of blaclists used in
sendmail.mc that are producing good results?
I can recommend *against* spambag.org. They recently decided to block all
of Hotmail and MSN. (Then again, if you want to block those places, and
don't care t
We use the following RBLs.
sbl.spamhaus.org
blackholes.easynet.nl
dynablock.easynet.nl
Gary
> Could someone recommend a set of blaclists used in
> sendmail.mc that are producing good results?
>
> Thanks,
> -steve-
> --
> It is easier to make working code elegant than to make elegant code
>
