Re: [SAtalk] FORGED_EBAY_RCVD broken!

2002-06-21 Thread jason varsoke
Dan, How do you "set score to 0.0"? I'm having the opposite problem. All my scores in the Debug log are 0.0! But spamassassin -t works fine. Any suggestions? -j On Fri, 21 Jun 2002, Smart, Dan wrote: > > What's up with FORGED_EBAY_RCVD? Installed the CVS and now its been hitting > on mo

RE: [SAtalk] FORGED_EBAY_RCVD broken!

2002-06-21 Thread Smart, Dan
sassin list |Subject: Re: [SAtalk] FORGED_EBAY_RCVD broken! | | |Dan, | How do you "set score to 0.0"? I'm having the opposite |problem. All |my scores in the Debug log are 0.0! But spamassassin -t works fine. | |Any suggestions? | |-j | |On Fri, 21 Jun 2002, Smart, Dan wrote: |

RE: [SAtalk] FORGED_EBAY_RCVD broken!

2002-06-21 Thread Smart, Dan
The CVS won't let me login either, to try for any updates. Anything up with that? |-Original Message- |From: Smart, Dan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] |Sent: Friday, June 21, 2002 12:21 PM |To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] |Subject: [SAtalk] FORGED_EBAY_RCVD broken! | | | |What's up with FORGED_EBAY_RCV

RE: [SAtalk] FORGED_EBAY_RCVD broken!

2002-06-21 Thread jason varsoke
On Fri, 21 Jun 2002, Smart, Dan wrote: > You set score to 0.0 by putting in local.cf > > score FORGED_EBAY_RCVD 0.0 > > Your X-Spam-Status in the message headers shows 0.0 with not tests being > hit? yes. Here's what I get. (I deleted the subject line becasue I sent a message to this list

RE: [SAtalk] FORGED_EBAY_RCVD broken!

2002-06-21 Thread Bart Schaefer
I don't have *any* hits on FORGED_EBAY_RCVD in my logs for the past two weeks. However, it looks like this expression in EvalTests.pm: if($rcvd =~ /from.*\Q$domain\E.*[\[\(][0-9]+\.[0-9]+\.[0-9]+\.[0-9]+[\]\)].*by.*\Q$domain\E/) { might need a word-boundary delimiter before $domain: if($r

RE: [SAtalk] FORGED_EBAY_RCVD broken!

2002-06-21 Thread Bart Schaefer
On Fri, 21 Jun 2002, jason varsoke wrote: > This is my recipe: > > :0fw > | /usr/bin/spamassassin -P -D -c $HOME/etc/spamassassin/rules > > Though I don't have a file called "rules". Is that my problem? In this case "rules" should be a directory. Probably what you're after is | /usr/bin/spa

RE: [SAtalk] FORGED_EBAY_RCVD broken!

2002-06-21 Thread jason varsoke
On Fri, 21 Jun 2002, Bart Schaefer wrote: > On Fri, 21 Jun 2002, jason varsoke wrote: > > > This is my recipe: > > > > :0fw > > | /usr/bin/spamassassin -P -D -c $HOME/etc/spamassassin/rules > > > > Though I don't have a file called "rules". Is that my problem? > > In this case "rules" should be

RE: [SAtalk] FORGED_EBAY_RCVD broken!

2002-06-21 Thread Smart, Dan
_NULL_BLOCK,EXCUSE_16,FORGED_EBAY_RCVD,RCVD_IN_XBL,AWL version=2.40 X-Spam-Level: Parts/Attachments: |-Original Message- |From: Bart Schaefer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] |Sent: Friday, June 21, 2002 12:49 PM |To: Smart, Dan |Cc: spamassassin li

RE: [SAtalk] FORGED_EBAY_RCVD broken!

2002-06-21 Thread Bart Schaefer
On Fri, 21 Jun 2002, Smart, Dan wrote: > Bart: > > Still hitting on all messages There's also this at the very top of the function: if (exists $self->{from_domain_in_received}) { return $self->{from_domain_in_received}; } Is it possible that this value is not getting reset when spam

RE: [SAtalk] FORGED_EBAY_RCVD broken!

2002-06-21 Thread Bart Schaefer
On Fri, 21 Jun 2002, jason varsoke wrote: > Yes, Bart, thank you! I deleted the -c part of the line and now > everything works; but of course I'm not using any rules. Obviously you're using *some* rules, or nothing would be happening. > $HOME/etc/spamassassin should be a directory? Is it oka

RE: [SAtalk] FORGED_EBAY_RCVD broken!

2002-06-21 Thread jason varsoke
On Fri, 21 Jun 2002, Bart Schaefer wrote: > On Fri, 21 Jun 2002, jason varsoke wrote: > > > Yes, Bart, thank you! I deleted the -c part of the line and now > > everything works; but of course I'm not using any rules. > > Obviously you're using *some* rules, or nothing would be happening. > > >

RE: [SAtalk] FORGED_EBAY_RCVD broken!

2002-06-21 Thread Smart, Dan
an tested it against DCC. Granted, it detects newsletters just like spam. Not perfect, but I have found it very effective. <> |-Original Message- |From: jason varsoke [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] |Sent: Friday, June 21, 2002 2:25 PM |To: spamassassin list |Subject: RE: [SAtalk]