Hi James,
> -Original Message-
> From: James Herschel
> What I'm asking is:
> 1. Is the lack of a message-id header an accurate measure of spam?
> 2. Is this a rule in SpamAssassin? I haven't seen it in any reports
The Message-Id is an optional field. From what I have seen from posts ov
: Gilson, Larry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, September 10, 2003 3:10 PM
To: 'James Herschel'; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sourceforge. Net
Subject: RE: [SAtalk] Is no message-id header a good measure of spam?
Hi James,
> -Original Message-
> From: James Herschel
>
> "JH" == James Herschel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
JH> What I'm asking is:
JH> 1. Is the lack of a message-id header an accurate measure of spam?
I think it is, but that's only from observing SPAM I receive; I
rarely poke into the headers of my wanted mail.
However, when my father used t
