Re: [SAtalk] New (to me) spam technique

2003-06-30 Thread Justin Mason
Robert Menschel writes: >I haven't seen this one before ... slipped through most filtering rules. > >The spam has two parts -- spam in HTML, all graphics to avoid any/all >text filtering, and then a text section that appears to be normal text, >quoted from some source, that has nothing to do with

RE: [SAtalk] New (to me) spam technique

2003-06-30 Thread Matt Kettler
At 03:22 PM 6/30/2003 +0100, Darren Coleman wrote: It would be nice, although ultimately unworkable I guess, if SA could be engineered to ignore anything which isn't humanly-visible in an email. i.e. when spammers insert fake PGP signatures in tags to lower their score - SA should ignore it. The p

Re: [SAtalk] New (to me) spam technique

2003-06-30 Thread mikea
On Mon, Jun 30, 2003 at 03:22:39PM +0100, Darren Coleman wrote: > It would be nice, although ultimately unworkable I guess, if SA could be > engineered to ignore anything which isn't humanly-visible in an email. > i.e. when spammers insert fake PGP signatures in color="White"> tags to lower their

RE: [SAtalk] New (to me) spam technique

2003-06-30 Thread Darren Coleman
It would be nice, although ultimately unworkable I guess, if SA could be engineered to ignore anything which isn't humanly-visible in an email. i.e. when spammers insert fake PGP signatures in tags to lower their score - SA should ignore it. The problem with this, I guess, is that not only would