> I just kept adding zeroes one at a time 'til it worked... and
> I had to
> go that high on the system I'm using it on. Maybe I've got
> some other
> weird bug going on.
>
MEEP! You've just multiplied memory usage by a factor of ten for each zero.
A softlimit of 400 - 600 is us
Hi Derek
I also use qmail with SA but without the spamc-client from the
qmail-directory. There's a former posting of mine in the mailinglist archive
with a link to the instructions I followed to do this, involving renaming
the qmail-queue binary. Maybe that's also an option for you?
Regards
Ralf
Thanks for the suggestions, but I have upped the softlimit to completely
unreasonable amounts and even various reasonable ones to no avail.
I also need to reiterate the fact that I am not using qmail-scan - I am
using qmail-spamc, the qmail SA client that come with SA these days.
Is there anyth
I just kept adding zeroes one at a time 'til it worked... and I had to
go that high on the system I'm using it on. Maybe I've got some other
weird bug going on.
On the bright side, it's take DAYS to push a 1-gig message to that box.
Jason Haar wrote:
On Tue, May 27, 2003 at 09:11:53AM -0700,
On Tue, May 27, 2003 at 09:11:53AM -0700, Patrick Morris wrote:
> That's probably the case. I have to bump the amount of memory allowed
> for queue runs way up when running SA (or pretty much anything under
> qmailscanner).
>
> exec /usr/local/bin/softlimit -m 10 \
Don't do that. You'v
That's probably the case. I have to bump the amount of memory allowed
for queue runs way up when running SA (or pretty much anything under
qmailscanner).
This works for me in /service/qmail-smtpd/run:
#!/bin/sh
QMAILDUID=`/usr/xpg4/bin/id -u qmaild`
NOFILESGID=`/usr/xpg4/bin/id -g qmaild`
MAXS
On Sun, 2003-05-25 at 15:56, Derek C. wrote:
> Ok, let's try this again, I think i sent this from the wrong address
> before, and then when I tried to send again, I fount that I had messed up
> my MX record trying to set it up for qmtp (stupid trailing dots!!!), so the
> listserv wouldn't accept
