The last I heard on this was that the recommendation was to add "; NO UCE"
to the end of your SMTP banner. At one point at least one spamware honored
that.
--
Kent Hamilton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Manager - Systems & Networking
Hunter Engineering Company
> -Original Message-
> From: Harold
| email systems. One responder on this list said he/she included something
| in the HELO response on the SMTP server. Does anyone know of any standards
| in this area as to what a legally enforcible "no spam" SMTP response would
I Am Not A Lawyer
I don't really know about the enforceability of
At Fri Dec 13 18:46:52 2002, Steve Thomas wrote:
>
> | email systems. One responder on this list said he/she included something
> | in the HELO response on the SMTP server. Does anyone know of any standards
> | in this area as to what a legally enforcible "no spam" SMTP response would
>
>
> I Am
At Fri Dec 13 17:04:17 2002, Harold Hallikainen wrote:
>
> Last week I posted a section of California law that permits ISPs
> to sue spammers if the spammer has been notified that the ISP does not
> accept spam. The law makes mention of automatic notification by the
> receivning email server
