At 7:58 AM -0800 10/30/03, Robert Abatecola wrote:
Has anyone else noticed a hugs increase in the amount of spam
lately? In the last month or so the volume has more than doubled and
a very large portion of it gets through spamassassin 2.41.
A month ago, we were seeing about 6-7 spams a da
Nice stats Mike! Custom script?
> -Original Message-
> From: mikea
> Sent: Thursday, October 30, 2003 1:19 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [SAtalk] Significant increase in spam lately
>
>
> On Thu, Oct 30, 2003 at 01:01:49PM -0500, Colin A. Bartlett w
On Thu, Oct 30, 2003 at 01:01:49PM -0500, Colin A. Bartlett wrote:
> Chris Santerre Sent: Thursday, October 30, 2003 12:01 PM
>
> > My ratio has been about the same. ~55% average spam.
>
> My SA server, which is used by my own company and another small ISP, is
> currently receiving about 75% SPAM
Robert Abatecola wrote:
> Has anyone else noticed a hugs increase in the amount of spam lately?
> In the last month or so the volume has more than doubled and a very
> large portion of it gets through spamassassin 2.41.
At the very least, you should upgrade to 2.44 (or 2.45 if it ever
existed)- th
Chris Santerre Sent: Thursday, October 30, 2003 12:01 PM
> My ratio has been about the same. ~55% average spam.
My SA server, which is used by my own company and another small ISP, is
currently receiving about 75% SPAM. And, yes, I too have noticed (casually)
a marked increase in spam in the last
Chris Santerre wrote:
>> Has anyone else noticed a hugs increase in the amount of spam lately?
>> In the last month or so the volume has more than doubled and a very
>> large portion of it gets through spamassassin 2.41.
>>
>> I have been running spamassassin for almost two years. I have
>> resis
>
> Has anyone else noticed a hugs increase in the amount of spam lately?
> In the last month or so the volume has more than doubled and a very
> large portion of it gets through spamassassin 2.41.
>
> I have been running spamassassin for almost two years. I have
> resisted upgrading because
