> From: Matt Kettler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, December 19, 2003 11:59 AM
> To: Sneak; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [SAtalk] SpamAssassins local.cf
>
>
> At 02:44 AM 12/19/2003, Sneak wrote:
> >trusted_networks 10/8
> >trusted_netwo
> -Original Message-
> From: Matt Kettler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> At 12:07 PM 12/19/2003, Gilson, Larry wrote:
> >I am confused. Mail::SpamAssassin::Conf states the following:
> >
> > "This operates additively, so a trusted_networks line
> > after another one will result i
At 12:07 PM 12/19/2003, Gilson, Larry wrote:
I am confused. Mail::SpamAssassin::Conf states the following:
"This operates additively, so a trusted_networks line
after another one will result in all those networks
becoming trusted."
Whoops, my bad.
Perhaps *I* should RTFM... Or at l
At 02:44 AM 12/19/2003, Sneak wrote:
trusted_networks 10/8
trusted_networks 10.1/16
trusted_networks 196.123.129.16
trusted_networks 127/8
trusted_networks 127.0.0.1
Is the above correct?
No, unlike whitelists, there's only *one* trusted_networks line with
multiple networks listed on the one lin
