Re: [SAtalk] slow list

2003-10-18 Thread Justin Mason
"Colin A. Bartlett" writes: >Matthew McGehrin Sent: Friday, October 17, 2003 12:40 PM > >> I think you are expecting too much from a 'Free' List Server. > >Just to set the record straight, It wasn't my intent to complain... only see >if others had the same issues. If other people feel stupid becau

Re: [SAtalk] slow list

2003-10-17 Thread Patrick Morris
Welcome to SourceForge... Happens all the time with their lists. Colin A. Bartlett wrote: Moderately Off Topic: Does anyone else have trouble getting their messages on the list in a timely fashion? It seems when I reply to the list it takes 15 to 45 minutes for my message to appear. By the time

RE: [SAtalk] slow list

2003-10-17 Thread Larry Gilson
; From: Matthew McGehrin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, October 17, 2003 12:40 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [SAtalk] slow list > > > I think you are expecting too much from a 'Free' List Server. > > I would think delivery times up to an hour

RE: RE: [SAtalk] slow list

2003-10-17 Thread Larry Gilson
17, 2003 12:11 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: fwd: RE: [SAtalk] slow list > > > Larry Gilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > I'd be lucky to see the post in a half hour. > > >From the Received headers on my copy, edited down to > what perta

RE: [SAtalk] slow list

2003-10-17 Thread Colin A. Bartlett
Matthew McGehrin Sent: Friday, October 17, 2003 12:40 PM > I think you are expecting too much from a 'Free' List Server. Just to set the record straight, It wasn't my intent to complain... only see if others had the same issues. If other people feel stupid because of redundant posting, well than

Re: [SAtalk] slow list

2003-10-17 Thread Matthew McGehrin
I think you are expecting too much from a 'Free' List Server. I would think delivery times up to an hour are expected. My messages arrive in 15 to 20 minutes. I'm on some security lists that the delay is closer to 2 hours. -- Matthew - Original Message - From: "Colin A. Bartlett" <[EMAIL

Re: [SAtalk] slow list

2003-10-17 Thread Gary Carr
I see the same thing. In fact my messages hardly make it to the list. - Original Message - From: "Colin A. Bartlett" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, October 17, 2003 10:37 AM Subject: [SAtalk] slow list > Moderately Off Topic: > > Does anyone else have trouble g

fwd: RE: [SAtalk] slow list

2003-10-17 Thread Dan Wilder
Larry Gilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I'd be lucky to see the post in a half hour. >From the Received headers on my copy, edited down to what pertains to this question: > Received: from sc8-sf-list2.sourceforge.net > by mail.ssc.com > Fri, 17 Oct 2003 08:46:12 -0700 (PDT) abo

Re: [SAtalk] slow list

2003-10-17 Thread Dan Wilder
On Fri, Oct 17, 2003 at 10:37:53AM -0400, Colin A. Bartlett wrote: > Moderately Off Topic: > > Does anyone else have trouble getting their messages on the list in a timely > fashion? It seems when I reply to the list it takes 15 to 45 minutes for my > message to appear. By the time my reply shows

RE: [SAtalk] slow list

2003-10-17 Thread Larry Gilson
I'd be lucky to see the post in a half hour. --Larry > -Original Message- > From: Colin A. Bartlett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, October 17, 2003 10:38 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [SAtalk] slow list > > > Moderately Off Topic: > > Does anyone else have trouble

Re: [SAtalk] slow list

2003-10-17 Thread Matt Kettler
At 10:37 AM 10/17/2003, Colin A. Bartlett wrote: Does anyone else have trouble getting their messages on the list in a timely fashion? It seems when I reply to the list it takes 15 to 45 minutes for my message to appear. By the time my reply shows up, 3 other people have replied and I look like a d

Re: [SAtalk] slow list

2003-10-17 Thread Jeff Howie (GROG!)
On Fri, Oct 17, 2003 at 10:37:53AM -0400, Colin A. Bartlett wrote: > Does anyone else have trouble getting their messages on the list in > a timely fashion? It seems when I reply to the list it takes 15 to > 45 minutes for my message to appear. By the time my reply shows up, > 3 other people have r