Re: [SAtalk] spamd and -a option in 2.60?

2003-10-06 Thread mikea
On Mon, Oct 06, 2003 at 03:30:17PM -0400, Rob Mangiafico wrote: > Actually, when I type "spamd --help" from the command line with our newly > installed 2.60 software, I get: > --- > Insecure directory in $ENV{PATH} while running with -T switch at > /usr/lib/perl5/5.6.0/Cwd.pm line 85. Perhaps y

RE: [SAtalk] spamd and -a option in 2.60?

2003-10-06 Thread Rob Mangiafico
> Actually, when I type "spamd --help" from the command line with our newly > installed 2.60 software, I get: > --- > Insecure directory in $ENV{PATH} while running with -T switch at > /usr/lib/perl5/5.6.0/Cwd.pm line 85. > --- > > spamd appears to be running fine currently. Any ideas why this i

RE: [SAtalk] spamd and -a option in 2.60?

2003-10-06 Thread Rob Mangiafico
> > It's the first option on the list if you type spamd --help > > Thanks. Just didn't see it in the online docs, so wanted to make sure and > feed it back to the doc maintainers. Actually, when I type "spamd --help" from the command line with our newly installed 2.60 software, I get: --- In

RE: [SAtalk] spamd and -a option in 2.60?

2003-10-06 Thread Rob Mangiafico
> It's the first option on the list if you type spamd --help Thanks. Just didn't see it in the online docs, so wanted to make sure and feed it back to the doc maintainers. > > In the 2.60 docs, the -a "auto whitelist" parameter is no > > longer listed as an option. Is it still supported? If n

RE: [SAtalk] spamd and -a option in 2.60?

2003-10-06 Thread Tom Meunier
It's the first option on the list if you type spamd --help > -Original Message- > From: Rob Mangiafico [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, October 06, 2003 1:10 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [SAtalk] spamd and -a option in 2.60? > > In the 2.60 docs, the -a "auto whitelis