Hmmm... How much negative score should smileys get... ;)
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of Benjamin A. Shelton
> Sent: Tuesday, June 17, 2003 8:41 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [SAtalk] Yet anothe
> Hmmm... How much negative score should smileys get... ;)
;-)
Well, with the changes I've read about that are due to be released in 2.60,
I almost can't wait!
---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: INetU
Attention Web Developers & Consultan
> Nonsense. I told you why it had a sudden increase in negative scores. It
> was because I installed 2.5x.
Hi Frank,
I missed your reply, unfortunately. Although, I think everyone else did to
:-(
My apologies!
---
This SF.Net email is sp
On Tue, 17 Jun 2003, Benjamin A. Shelton wrote:
> > Nerd alert: Maybe auto-whitelisting was enabled (producing negative
> scoreds)?
>
> I beg your pardon. I sometimes have the tendency to completely ignore the
> obvious :-p
>
Nonsense. I told you why it had a sudden increase in negative score
> Heh. Prob. the "nerd alert" was a bit ambiguous; just meant as a way to
> describe the tekkie detail of the topic. - Gary
See? This is the problem with e-mail -- if you forget smilies, sometimes
it's hard to read tongue-in-cheek messages correctly ;-)
Ahh well, all in good fun. It's my fault
> Nerd alert: Maybe auto-whitelisting was enabled (producing negative
scoreds)?
I beg your pardon. I sometimes have the tendency to completely ignore the
obvious :-p
---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: INetU
Attention Web Developers & Cons
> -Original Message-
> From: Frank Pineau
> Sent: Monday, June 16, 2003 3:06 PM
>
> On Sun, 15 Jun 2003 21:56:20 -0600, you wrote:
>
> >I don't mean to drag this too far off-topic, but I'm a little curious.
> >What happened about two-thirds
> >of the way after 02/01 that increased the
On Sun, 15 Jun 2003 21:56:20 -0600, you wrote:
>I don't mean to drag this too far off-topic, but I'm a little curious.
>What happened about two-thirds
>of the way after 02/01 that increased the distribution of negatively
>scoring spam?
SA 2.5x ;-)
---
On Sun, Jun 15, 2003 at 07:40:03PM -0700, Clint Byrum wrote:
> Hey guys. I just subscribed to the list, but have been reading the
> archives for a while. I'm aware of some of the other spamd stat
> reporters out there. I have written two more. One, spamdstats, is a perl
> script that reports stats
I like it. Another respondant mentioned graphing the scores as well. Someone
else on this list gave me a script they use to plot scores with gnuplot (see
attachment). I'd rather have it in an RRD database, though, but I haven't
gotten around to porting it yet. I'd be interested in seeing your
On 15 Jun 2003 19:40:03 -0700, you wrote:
>I'm cleaning up the code for both for a full release. If you want to
>check out the graphs from spamrrd though, you can go to
>
>http://spamaps.org/spamrrd/
I like it. Another respondant mentioned graphing the scores as well. Someone
else on this list
>
>
>If you like, please let me know what you would do to improve it based on
>that. I should be ready to release code in the next couple of days
>(honestly its alright, but I need to get copyright messages and a decent
>README into it).
>
Clint,
That looks pretty darn awesome!!! It's amazing just
12 matches
Mail list logo
