RE: Re[2]: [SAtalk] [RD] MSGID_GOOD_EXCHANGE

2003-09-09 Thread AltGrendel
On Mon, 2003-09-08 at 09:39, Mike Kuentz (2) wrote: > We do site wide here, so I've had to make adjustments, too. Not ready to do > bayes, yet. Not sure how well it would work for a site wide environment. > We do consulting, so most of our FPs used to come from "Dear Sir, look at my > resume", fl

RE: Re[2]: [SAtalk] [RD] MSGID_GOOD_EXCHANGE

2003-09-08 Thread Mike Kuentz (2)
#x27;[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: Re[2]: [SAtalk] [RD] MSGID_GOOD_EXCHANGE WARNING: Unsanitized content follows. -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Friday, September 5, 2003, 2:37:39 PM, someone posted: ST> Chris Santerre wrote: >>We tend to be very vague on custom nega

Re: Re[2]: [SAtalk] [RD] MSGID_GOOD_EXCHANGE

2003-09-07 Thread Justin Mason
Robert Menschel writes: >* What specific business are your people in? Much of our mail deals with >lumber and building materials. ... Ssh! This is a public forum! Don't mention the lumber cartel!! http://lumbercartel.freeyellow.com/ ;) --j. ---

Re[2]: [SAtalk] [RD] MSGID_GOOD_EXCHANGE

2003-09-05 Thread Robert Menschel
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Friday, September 5, 2003, 2:37:39 PM, someone posted: ST> Chris Santerre wrote: >>We tend to be very vague on custom negative rules. Spammers are >>listening on this list. Most of it happens off list. really not much >>else we can do about it. ST