To: John Schneider; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: FW: Re[2]: [SAtalk] why is sa not catching the microsoft emails
?
Hello John,
JS> Abigail,
JS> If a user puts this recipe into their .procmail file,
JS> where would the log entries be collected. (Sorry, but
JS> I'm a procma
Original Message-
JS> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
JS> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Abigail
JS> Marshall
JS> Sent: Tuesday, September 23, 2003 5:10 PM
JS> To: Stephen Reese; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
JS> Subject: Re[2]: [SAtalk] why is sa not catching the microsoft emails ?
JS&g
Reese
Subject: Re: Re[2]: [SAtalk] why is sa not catching the microsoft emails
?
This could also be 2.55 issue where messages with multiple MIME parts
was not completly scanned? For example, the thread about pic.gif where
that spammer used some trick with multiple mime parts and that caused
the messa
This could also be 2.55 issue where messages with multiple MIME parts was
not completly scanned?
For example, the thread about pic.gif where that spammer used some trick
with multiple mime parts
and that caused the message to be invisible. The good news is this is fixed
in 2.60 and that's a final
Hello Stephen,
Tuesday, September 23, 2003, 3:09:51 PM, you wrote:
SR> h, i still don't understand why SA is not even looking at them
SR> though see's everything else?
Because the 150K attachment that comes with Swen is either
too big to be sent to SA (depending on how you have
configured
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Simon,
Tuesday, September 23, 2003, 4:37:27 PM, you wrote:
SB> Although I havn't tried it, I would say that teaching the message to
BAYES
SB> using sa-learn in 2.60 should be very effective, as BAYES_99 in 2.60
has a
SB> high enough score to ta
