Hello Sylvain, Friday, January 23, 2004, 8:04:51 AM, you wrote:
>> Yes, that one works for me: >> SYL_BAD_XOIPa -- 3881s/0h of 91714 corpus (74113s/17601h) 01/22/04 SR> Beautiful! Thanks for checking that! Perhaps I can buy you a salted SR> ham sandwich some time! :-) I prefer unsalted, thanks. ;-) Kosher if you can manage it. >> With results like this, 5% of the spam in my corpus and no ham, >> this is a rule that should be added to the next distribution set >> (or at least a variation thereof). SR> Wow! I'd be really happy to see that ... With results like these, so would many others, I expect. >> Would you have any objection to submitting for consideration, >> and sending in an Apache Contributor License Agreement so the SA >> developers can use this rule? SR> I'll be glad to, as soon as I can figure out where to get what I SR> need, and what needs to be submitted how, etc. If I need to provide SR> test results, may I quote yours? You can get the CLA and instructions concerning it at http://www.apache.org/licenses/#clas -- address and fax numbers to send it in with are in the CLA itself. Submission recommendations are at http://wiki.spamassassin.org/w/ContributingNewRules You shouldn't need any help with any of this, but let me know if you do. Bob Menschel ------------------------------------------------------- The SF.Net email is sponsored by EclipseCon 2004 Premiere Conference on Open Tools Development and Integration See the breadth of Eclipse activity. February 3-5 in Anaheim, CA. http://www.eclipsecon.org/osdn _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
