On Tue, Mar 02, 2004 at 05:43:10PM -0500, Theo Van Dinter wrote:
> Anyway, it should now, once an hour in theory, update the website and
> the devel tarballs to the latest 3.0.0 code.
Looking quite different indeed :)
Minor issue: README and INSTALL cannot be found.
Thanks for your help.
chee
> I'm running Mandrake 9.0, Kmail 3.0.3, SA 2.63. Question I have
> is there is
> always a SA process running as shown by Ksysguard. When mail comes in
> another SA process starts along with spamc. Is this normal? If not,
> anyone know how to stop the second spamd process from being called?
> I now have a folder full of emails from legitimate users with verified
> spam as attachments - the spam attachments appear to have all headers.
>
> Can i just run "sa-learn --spam" on that folder? Does spamassassin know
> to only look at the attachment?
No and no.
> Or do i somehow have to extr
Hi Guys,
I am using Horde/IMP webmail and have enabled the 'Report as Spam' link
which emails me the offending spam mail AS AN ATTACHMENT.
Is this correct behaviour?
I now have a folder full of emails from legitimate users with verified
spam as attachments - the spam attachments appear to have a
I am not sure if this is common knowledge or not, but I was curious about
the frequency each test identified spam so I ran some numbers and I got the
following. I was trying to determine if I should continue to run dcc, razor
and pyzor.
The 'mails' column is the total number of spam caught. The
I'm running Mandrake 9.0, Kmail 3.0.3, SA 2.63. Question I have is there is
always a SA process running as shown by Ksysguard. When mail comes in
another SA process starts along with spamc. Is this normal? If not,
anyone know how to stop the second spamd process from being called?
Thanks
Ch
On Tue, 2 Mar 2004, Jeff wrote:
[...]
> This is whats in my .procmailrc
> MAILDIR=$HOME/mail
> LOGFILE=$HOME/.proclog
>
> :0fw
> | spamassassin
dunno how those procmail logs looks like, but maybe a $PATH problem ? try:
| /usr/local/bin/spamassassin
well, if there is another prefix,
I opened a bug on this when 2.55 was current; I received word on 18Feb that
it was corrected in the current 2.70 cvs. SA isn't 'filtering' the high
priority messages but it does assign an extra half-point hit if sent via
Exchange.
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2300
--eric
--
Gee, an entire domain to add to BigEvil! ;-) About 10 different spams from
this guy in the last couple hours. It looks like everrthing in front of
forgetmei in the url is just random words.
Loren
http://driven.fragrant.forgetmei.com/gld/gld.php"; target=3D"_bl=
ank">
http://liven.respo
no you don't need to upgrade but i had a similar problem when i updated
perl so i just downgraded again
On Tue, 2004-03-02 at 17:39, Jeff Honken wrote:
> No, I haven't upgraded. I'm using 5.6.1. What
> should version should I upgrade to? Jeff
> --- Butrus orman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
Hello,
I have been running Spamassassin 2.63 with spamd for some
time now and have really not had any problems. However, I would like to add virus
scanning to my setup and the only way I see to do this is with Amavis. I
downloaded and installed Amavis and have it working…basically. T
On Tue, Mar 02, 2004 at 03:01:02PM -0500, Theo Van Dinter wrote:
> It hasn't been called 2.70 for a while (over a month?), and the latest
> revision is 6970.
Turns out the cronjob to update the website dev code wasn't quite
working right. Beyond the fact it was trying to do cvs ... ;)
Anyway, it
No, I haven't upgraded. I'm using 5.6.1. What
should version should I upgrade to? Jeff
--- Butrus orman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> did you upgrade your perl after installing SA
>
> On Tue, 2004-03-02 at 17:18, Jeff wrote:
> > I'm getting some errors in my log file for
> Spamassassin. It kee
did you upgrade your perl after installing SA
On Tue, 2004-03-02 at 17:18, Jeff wrote:
> I'm getting some errors in my log file for Spamassassin. It keeps giving me
> an "spamassassin: No such file or directory" error in the log file.
> Also I'm not getting the spam in my "spam" file. The confi
I'm getting some errors in my log file for Spamassassin. It keeps giving me
an "spamassassin: No such file or directory" error in the log file.
Also I'm not getting the spam in my "spam" file. The configuration that I have
is Redhat Linux 7.3 and Spamassassin 2.63-1 and Procmail 3.22-5.
My .p
Christopher Joyce <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Currently, I am running SA 2.63 and it appears that whenever
> someone sends an "urgent" email with Outlook 2003, it's
> filtered by SA.
By "filtered", do you mean scored as spam?
> If the email is sent with Outlook 2000 and
> labeled as "urgent", SA
Hello,
Currently, I am running SA 2.63 and it appears that whenever someone sends
an "urgent" email with Outlook 2003, it's filtered by SA. If the email is
sent with Outlook 2000 and labeled as "urgent", SA will not filter the
message. This problem only exists with Outlook 2003.
Has anyone ex
On Mon, 1 Mar 2004, Bob George wrote:
> header MY_SPAM_1 X-MessageWall-Score: =~/(1[5-9]|[2-9][0-9]).*/
> describe MY_SPAM message wall scored between 15 and 99
>
> work?
Almost.
Nobody has pointed this out yet, but the ".*" is extraneous at the end of
the regexes suggested by nearly everyone s
On Monday 01 Mar 2004 6:16 pm, Bob Mortimer wrote:
> > In your amavisd.conf file, set $sa_tag_level_deflt to -99.0 to get
> > the X-Spam-Status header added to all emails.
>
> Seems to make no difference at all - I'm getting it to send a notification
> alert which works OK, but the original spam e
On Tue, Mar 02, 2004 at 09:15:46PM +0100, Alex van den Bogaerdt wrote:
> The original file I fetched (also today) was dated february 16th.
>
> Sorry I didn't spot this; I'll try some other mirrors.
and now I'm ready to give up :(
ll -rt Mail-Spam*
-rw---1 alex alex 961950 Jan
On Tue, Mar 02, 2004 at 03:06:50PM -0500, Matt Kettler wrote:
> Case in point - running CVS builds, while 99% likely to work correctly,
> does occasionally result in a non-working version as a result of developer
> re-writes.
Thanks. I'm just curious about SPF support so I'll take my chances :
On Tue, Mar 02, 2004 at 03:08:52PM -0500, Theo Van Dinter wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 02, 2004 at 03:01:02PM -0500, Theo Van Dinter wrote:
> > > X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.70-r6565 (2004-02-07) on
> >
> > It hasn't been called 2.70 for a while (over a month?), and the latest
> > revision is 6
On Tue, Mar 02, 2004 at 03:01:02PM -0500, Theo Van Dinter wrote:
> > X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.70-r6565 (2004-02-07) on
>
> It hasn't been called 2.70 for a while (over a month?), and the latest
> revision is 6970.
yes, before anyone corrects me, I do, now that I thought about it, re
At 02:53 PM 3/2/2004, Alex van den Bogaerdt wrote:
Hi,
I have a problem with autolearning and the latest snapshot.
Somehow, I managed to set spamassassin up so that a spam score
of over 18 results in _ham_...
According to bugzilla, this *was* a bug and is already fixed. However:
X-Spam-Flag: YES
On Tue, Mar 02, 2004 at 08:53:53PM +0100, Alex van den Bogaerdt wrote:
> I have a problem with autolearning and the latest snapshot.
Well, you're not on the last snapshot by a long shot.
> X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.70-r6565 (2004-02-07) on
> slot.hollandcasino.net
It hasn't
Hi,
I have a problem with autolearning and the latest snapshot.
Somehow, I managed to set spamassassin up so that a spam score
of over 18 results in _ham_...
According to bugzilla, this *was* a bug and is already fixed. However:
Mar 2 15:34:16 slot spamd[19098]: debug: DNS MX records found: 2
On Tue, 2 Mar 2004, Loren Wilton wrote:
> 0.037? 1.118? Are you sure you are running stock scores?
I dug into this a little further. I *thought* that SA would be triggering
on the 'compliance with US federal laws' line, but it turns out the only
two tests were for standard 'click to take off'
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, March 02, 2004 12:51 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: the nerve! wiki spammer
>
> I've just cleaned up a "search engine optimization" web
> spammer's attempts
> to use the SpamAssassin Wiki
Matt Thoene wrote:
Anyone else receive one like below? It's tricky in that it shows up as
a forward, and has a bunch of MailScanner info in the headers. I'm not
running MailScanner on my server...
Almost looks like they forgot the spam? And of all things I've seen
spamvertized.. a TORTOISE?!
Has d
James Nelson wrote:
Greetings,
I am trying to create a custom rule that will take away x pts if an
email is sent from a particular domain. Can someone please let me know if
this is correct syntax? If not, please correct me.
describe DOMAIN_CHECK Mail from a particular domain
header DOM
Anyone else receive one like below? It's tricky in that it shows up as
a forward, and has a bunch of MailScanner info in the headers. I'm not
running MailScanner on my server...
--
Regards,
Matt
Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Original-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delivere
I've just cleaned up a "search engine optimization" web spammer's attempts
to use the SpamAssassin Wiki to gain PageRank. The irony of attempting
to use an anti-spam Wiki, to spam, should not be overlooked ;)
The spammer came from 61.17.115.6 --
: jm 1008...; whois 61.17.115.0
% [whois.apnic.ne
On Mon, 1 Mar 2004 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I've been using Messagewall for a while now, and I decided to throw
> SpamAssassin into the mix. Messagewall is great, but it's not dynamic
> enough.
>
> Problem is that I eventually want messagewall to tag messages only, then
> pass them on to SA.
>
At 01:22 PM 3/2/2004, Jack L. Stone wrote:
...which means they may restore an older version of your file??
No, I checked on the back end via FTP.. it's all there and up-to-date..
it's just the linkage between the back end and the front end that seems
hosed now. (ie: the webserver fails to rea
jennifer said:
> Does anyone have a copy of weeds2.cf? I put the sets back up on my page
> because so many people have been emailing that they couldn't get them.
> I don't, however, have a copy of weeds2 for some reason. (I like the
> original weeds better anyway) I could rewrite them, but I don
At 11:27 AM 3.2.2004 -0500, Matt Kettler wrote:
>At 10:05 AM 3/2/2004, Gary Smith wrote:
>>Rules_du_jour is generating errors today:
>>
>>The following rules had 404 errors:
>>Matt Kettler's AntiDrug not found (404) at
>>http://mywebpages.comcast.net/mkettler/sa/antidrug.cf
>
>Update: I just spoke
Does anyone have a copy of weeds2.cf? I put the sets back up on my page
because so many people have been emailing that they couldn't get them.
I don't, however, have a copy of weeds2 for some reason. (I like the
original weeds better anyway) I could rewrite them, but I dont really
feel like it.
Looks to me like it should work.
Note you could also use whitelist_from, but that subtracts a whole lotta
points.
Loren
> I am trying to create a custom rule that will take away x pts if an
> email is sent from a particular domain. Can someone please let me know if
> this is correct syn
> Anybody know of a rule for the long strings of random words that don't
> contain words like 'the, to, a, an, then, and' and those sort of words?
I'd
Here are two sets. The first one checks only for long strings without
punctuation, and works pretty well. The second set is a modified version
th
At 12:58 PM 3/2/2004, James Nelson wrote:
Greetings,
I am trying to create a custom rule that will take away x pts if an
email is sent from a particular domain. Can someone please let me know if
this is correct syntax? If not, please correct me.
describe DOMAIN_CHECK Mail from a particu
Greetings,
I am trying to create a custom rule that will take away x pts if an
email is sent from a particular domain. Can someone please let me know if
this is correct syntax? If not, please correct me.
describe DOMAIN_CHECK Mail from a particular domain
header DOMAIN_CHECK From =
JC wrote:
Richard J. Kieran is fast becoming the bane of my existance. Can we cut him
loose? Please? :)
This guy ended up in my killfile after the second NDR. Stupid, dumb,
MTA. Use the Envelope-From!!! ARGH!
Steven
--
Steven Dickenson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http://www.mrchuckles.net
Jon Etkins wrote:
I've put a temporary copy up at http://www.snikte.net/antidrug.cf until
Comcast gets Matt's site back on the air.
Thank you Jon.
Chris
Lol, yeah. That idea seems like it's getting worse and worse with every
post.
Anybody know of a rule for the long strings of random words that don't
contain words like 'the, to, a, an, then, and' and those sort of words? I'd
try to write one, but my REGEX skills are inexistent.
Thanks for y
0.037? 1.118? Are you sure you are running stock scores? Those seem
REALLY low to me! I just ran that here, and with the truncated headers the
only meaningful test that hit was EARN_MONEY at 1.0 points.
I am a little surprised that I didn't get some hits on things like the
"federal email laws"
Hi everyone!
I seem to have a strange problem
I am using SpamAssassin 2.70-CVS (Yesterday's build) with a BayesSQL Store.
SA-Learn works when I
populated the BayesTables or when I do a rebuild, without errors. However, I
am seeing
"autolearn=unavailable" in the headers of my messages. Th
>
> Forgive me being a total novice, is it a central storage where rules can
> be downloaded and deployed (probably need a how-to description as well)?
http://www.spamfighter.org has a download section with the major rulesets
that this list talks about. These are direct links to the authors rules.
JC <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Darn. I hadn't thought of that. C wouldn't have been a huge
> issue, but the emoticons I could see as possibly an issue.
Well, messages to the procmail list often wind up with content translated TO
emoticons by "friendly" client software.
Add procmail to the list o
No waiting rooms. Here. http://www.majesticdrugs.biz.
Is there a discussion list or support forum for pop3proxy? Mine died
last night with the following error:
Can't create new socket for incoming connection: Bad file descriptor at
D:\pop3proxy\pop3proxy.pl line 397.
While it's stable 99% of the time, this is the second time this has
happened, and
On Tue, 02 Mar 2004 11:03:13 -0500, Christopher M. Iarocci wrote:
>Matt Kettler wrote:
>
>> At 11:10 AM 3/2/04 +, Thomas Muller wrote:
>>
>>> In particular I need some more rules that can take all the viagra
>>> variants (like Generi*c V-iagra Half Price Guaran-teed etc).
>>
>>
>>
>> http://my
Yeah, there's probably be an easier way to write this, but in the interest
of time here's what I ended up with (and it works):
bayes_ignore_header X-MessageWall-Score
header MW_SPAM_15_AND_19 X-MessageWall-Score =~ /1[5-9].*/
describe MW_SPAM_15_AND_19 Messagewall scored between 15 and 19
score
At 10:05 AM 3/2/2004, Gary Smith wrote:
Rules_du_jour is generating errors today:
The following rules had 404 errors:
Matt Kettler's AntiDrug not found (404) at
http://mywebpages.comcast.net/mkettler/sa/antidrug.cf
Update: I just spoke with comcast. Apparently they had some problems with
their per
Hallo!
Well, this is a bit strange. I got a spam with some very obvious
spam 'taglines' in it, and went looking for the reason it scored so low.
As seen below, SA hit on the 'excuses' but scored them ridiculously low.
Is there really any ham that uses those excuses that they need to be
scored so l
At 10:05 AM 3/2/2004, Gary Smith wrote:
Rules_du_jour is generating errors today:
The following rules had 404 errors:
Matt Kettler's AntiDrug not found (404) at
http://mywebpages.comcast.net/mkettler/sa/antidrug.cf
Gary
No, I've not moved.. it appears comcast's server is having issues. The
underly
Gary Smith wrote:
Rules_du_jour is generating errors today:
The following rules had 404 errors:
Matt Kettler's AntiDrug not found (404) at
http://mywebpages.comcast.net/mkettler/sa/antidrug.cf
Gary
None of the rules on Jennifer's site are working either. I know she
said they were moving, but I
Richard J. Kieran is fast becoming the bane of my existance. Can we cut him
loose? Please? :)
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, March 02, 2004 11:04 AM
> To: JC
> Subject: NDN: RE: Need a rule for
Hi, I am running redhat 8 with spamassassin 2.63, with qmail-scanner and
clamscan.
I recently upgraded to clamscan 1.20 (was running clamscan 1.20rc3) and
now I am getting the following messages in my maillog. It seems that I
am also not getting the messages tagged as spam. When upgrading to
qma
Darn. I hadn't thought of that. C wouldn't have been a huge issue, but the
emoticons I could see as possibly an issue.
>
> > One of the things I noticed about this was the
> punctuation. It's there, but
> > NOBODY I know puts a space BEFORE their punctuation.
>
> U
Matt Kettler wrote:
At 11:10 AM 3/2/04 +, Thomas Muller wrote:
In particular I need some more rules that can take all the viagra
variants (like Generi*c V-iagra Half Price Guaran-teed etc).
http://mywebpages.comcast.net/mkettler/sa/antidrug.cf
Won't cover the half-price part, but covers a very
Rules_du_jour is generating errors today:
The following rules had 404 errors:
Matt Kettler's AntiDrug not found (404) at
http://mywebpages.comcast.net/mkettler/sa/antidrug.cf
Gary
On Monday 01 March 2004 11:54, Berend De Schouwer wrote:
> On Saturday 28 February 2004 05:46, Loren Wilton wrote:
> > I'm trying to come up with a way to detect bogus end tags, and so
> > far I'm not having much luck.
> >
> > What I'm specifically trying to catch are things like
> >
> >
> >
> >
On Tue, 2 Mar 2004, James Nelson wrote:
> This is the error I am seeing in the log when things start failing:
>
> Feb 29 23:50:09 mail3 spamc[6359]: failed sanity check, 1496 bytes claimed,
> 6188 bytes seen
>
> Any clue what is causing this?
have a look here, maybe its a character enconding prob
Hi,
Has anyone gotten this message?
Definate SPAM, but only scores 1.3
--
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.3 required=5.0
tests=BIZ_TLD,HOT_NASTY,HTML_20_30,
HTML_MESSAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60
ever seen these
wacky farm girl sites
check out these hot cowgirls play with their animals.
c
On Tue, 2 Mar 2004, James Nelson wrote:
> I am having a weird problem where at some point spamd just quits scanning
> email. There is no particular reason why... any clues? A restart of the
> daemon gets it back on track.
we have those trouble sometimes if the load of our machine gets way too
h
This is the error I am seeing in the log when things start failing:
Feb 29 23:50:09 mail3 spamc[6359]: failed sanity check, 1496 bytes claimed,
6188 bytes seen
Any clue what is causing this?
-Original Message-
From: James Nelson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, March 02, 2004 8
I am having a weird problem where at some point spamd just quits scanning
email. There is no particular reason why... any clues? A restart of the
daemon gets it back on track.
Hum. If SA could do random rewrites, or maybe just URI rewrites, then all
the BigEvil urls detected could be replaced with a link to a joke-of-the-day
page instead in those cases. Amybe add a footer below the spam footer
describing it as spam.
Loren
- Original Message -
From: "
Chip Paswater wrote:
Mostly locking problems.
Hurm, I'm a noobie... how do I know if I'm having locking problems?
Often Bayes would begin a rebuild then suddenly
die in the middle leaving it's scratch and lock files laying around to trip
up future spamassassin processes. I even tried using "learn_
Well, pretty much anything from HINET is spam, at least around here. So
that is one possible check. There really isn't much else, other than
another URL to add to the bigevil list if it isn't already there.
Probably could write a couple of rules for spaced-out and misspelled common
drug names.
I have read that spamassassin has problems if there are two copies of perl
installed on the server. When installing 2.60, I used cpan and the thing
installed a newer version of perl. I believe this is causing both my
problems with bayes and with DNS:NET:RESOLVER.
I know this isn't the best place
At 09:01 PM 3/1/04 -0800, Ed BK wrote:
I have a test rule that is not working
body LOCAL_DEMONSTRATION_RULE /test/
score LOCAL_DEMONSTRATION_RULE 5.0
describe LOCAL_DEMONSTRATION_RULE My test rule
I get this error
[EMAIL PROTECTED] root]# spamassassin --lint
Created user preferences file: /root/.
On Mon, 1 Mar 2004, Jeff Makey wrote:
> Regarding my patch, Theo Van Dinter wrote:
> >you change the expiry algorithm from LRU to FIFO, which is
> >very likely to cause checks to be less accurate.
>
> (For the acronym-impaired: those are Least Recently Used and
> First In, First Out.)
>
> Does sa-
At 04:25 PM 3/2/04 +0300, ÷ÁÓÉÌØÅ× áÎÄÓÅÊ wrote:
The messages from different lists used to have tagged Subject:,
but if we have non-ASCII charset in this field, the
subject_is_all_caps() returns false positive hit because it verifies
such charset only in the beginning of the line
(/^=\?${C
At 06:14 AM 3/2/04 -0600, Craig Jackson wrote:
Hi,
Spamassassin is running as user spamass. I wrote these Bash scripts that
learn from spam in users' IMAP folder (.SPAM); howver, this script runs
as root and then copies the bayes filters ... where? Into a
.spamassassin directory in spamass's $HOME?
÷ÁÓÉÌØÅ× áÎÄÒÅÊ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The messages from different lists used to have tagged
> Subject:, but if we have non-ASCII charset in this field, the
> subject_is_all_caps() returns false positive hit because it
> verifies such charset only in the beginning of the line
> (/^
Thomas Muller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've been trying out CommuniGate in conjunction with SpamAssassin for a
> while, and I must say my old client-side filter (Spammunition) caught a
> lot more spams than the default setup of SpamAssassin are doing now.
Are you using Bayes? Have you traine
John,
I also experienced the exact same thing. The default setup with no bayes
training really let most of my spam through our filters.
I chose to let the auto training of bayes to work and it did well since I get
to see at least 10,000 spams a day. Along with adding additional cf's I have
Hi!
The messages from different lists used to have tagged Subject:,
but if we have non-ASCII charset in this field, the
subject_is_all_caps() returns false positive hit because it verifies
such charset only in the beginning of the line
(/^=\?${CHARSETS_LIKELY_TO_FP_AS_CAPS}\?/). And w
Try these, they're not the prettiest, but at least work most of the time
:)
#This takes care of tags that don't exist such as
#The last / is in there so it doesn't freak out about closing tags.
# is a valid tag, but I don't believe we'll see it all that much in
email.
#Added in to not pickup <[EM
- Original Message -
From: "Thomas Muller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, March 02, 2004 6:10 AM
Subject: NEWBIE: Not extremely happy with SA filtering so far
> SpamAssassins,
>
> I've been trying out CommuniGate in conjunction with SpamAssassin for a
> while
Hi,
Spamassassin is running as user spamass. I wrote these Bash scripts that
learn from spam in users' IMAP folder (.SPAM); howver, this script runs
as root and then copies the bayes filters ... where? Into a
.spamassassin directory in spamass's $HOME? I ask because I tried that
and I'm not sure i
Thomas
Look here:
http://wiki.spamassassin.org/w/CustomRulesets
The wiki is an excelent resource for SA config and usage tips and growing fast
Cheers
Jon Gerdes
>>> "Thomas Muller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 03/02/04 11:10am >>>
SpamAssassins,
I've been trying out CommuniGate in conjunction with Spa
At 11:10 AM 3/2/04 +, Thomas Muller wrote:
In particular I need some more rules that can take all the viagra
variants (like Generi*c V-iagra Half Price Guaran-teed etc).
http://mywebpages.comcast.net/mkettler/sa/antidrug.cf
Won't cover the half-price part, but covers a very wide variety of via
At 01:00 AM 3/2/04 -0800, Jingmin (Jimmy) Zhou wrote:
Hi, sorry I did not attach the complete message in the previous
message - thought it's not so useful except the body. ;-) Hope
this time it's better.
Not to hawk my own rules, but this is the kind of garbage antidrug.cf was
designed to pick u
SpamAssassins,
I've been trying out CommuniGate in conjunction with SpamAssassin for a
while, and I must say my old client-side filter (Spammunition) caught a
lot more spams than the default setup of SpamAssassin are doing now. I
have the overall score threshold set to 5.0, but a lot of spam has o
> For stuff like this, I think the only thing I would maybe like to see is a
> comment in the file that indicates it could be an issue and where to
> comment
> it out. This makes everybody happy. You get to stay a hard @zz. And the
> folks that use BE are empowered to edit or skip the section th
Hi, sorry I did not attach the complete message in the previous
message - thought it's not so useful except the body. ;-) Hope
this time it's better.--- Begin Message ---
I and my lover have both noticed beautiful
improvements in our relationship.He is much older, and doesn't have the s e
x u
Do you have an empty line after the last
line? Perhaps that is throwing you out.
Danie
- Original Message -
From:
Ed BK
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, March 02, 2004 7:01
AM
Subject: RE Rule write error
I have a test rule that is not working
bo
"Jingmin (Jimmy) Zhou" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Sorry if it's reported already. I wonder if there is any rule to
> detect the following kind of spams? Recently I have noticed that
> many spams tend to be very short. Spammers are becoming more and
> more smart. ;-)
You really need to attach (
On Mon, Mar 01, 2004 at 10:00:52PM -0800, Jeff Makey wrote:
> Does sa-learn not update the atime on the Bayes tokens that it
> modifies? My full procedure includes using sa-learn on all
> non-whitelisted mail, so I would expect that the LRU aspect would be
> preserved.
Yes, sa-learn will update a
Regarding my patch, Theo Van Dinter wrote:
>you change the expiry algorithm from LRU to FIFO, which is
>very likely to cause checks to be less accurate.
(For the acronym-impaired: those are Least Recently Used and
First In, First Out.)
Does sa-learn not update the atime on the Bayes tokens that i
On Mon, Mar 01, 2004 at 09:35:53PM -0800, Jeff Makey wrote:
> I want to better understand the implications of the patch below before
> I submit it for use in a future version.
In short: you change the expiry algorithm from LRU to FIFO, which is
very likely to cause checks to be less accurate.
--
A month ago I got no response when I asked for a solution to this
problem, so let me describe what I came up with. It's not pretty,
but it works. First of all, spamd needs these settings:
bayes_auto_expire 0 # expiration requires write access
bayes_auto_learn 0 # learnin
I have a test rule that is not working
body LOCAL_DEMONSTRATION_RULE /test/score LOCAL_DEMONSTRATION_RULE 5.0describe LOCAL_DEMONSTRATION_RULE My test rule
I get this error
[EMAIL PROTECTED] root]# spamassassin --lintCreated user preferences file: /root/.spamassassin/user_prefsFailed to parse
Sorry
I'm using qmail with SA & qmail-scanner on a rh9 OS
I have my_rules.cf located in /usr/share/spamassassin/
my setting is for server wide nothing local
Thanks
Ed
PS I did restart sa after I added it
service spamassassin restart/etc/rc.d/init.d/spamassassin restart
Either works to restar
From: "Ed BK" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> I am trying to write a test rule but it will not work
>
> example
> body LOCAL_DEMONSTRATION_RULE /test/
> score LOCAL_DEMONSTRATION_RULE 5.0
> describe LOCAL_DEMONSTRATION_RULE My test rule
>
> I put this in a file named my_rules.cf in
> /etc/mail/spamassas
Hello,
I would like to rebuild my bayes DB from a sa.dump output. I then run
the sa.dump output thru a quick perl script that fixes things like
"spam count < 0", "ham count < 0", "atime > time()". this way i can
properly expire my tokens.
i tried using michael parker's script but it was crea
I am trying to write a test rule but it will not work
example
body LOCAL_DEMONSTRATION_RULE /test/score LOCAL_DEMONSTRATION_RULE 5.0describe LOCAL_DEMONSTRATION_RULE My test rule
I put this in a file named my_rules.cf in
/etc/mail/spamassassin/
and then run
service spamassassin restart
I am trying to write a test rule but it will not work
example
body LOCAL_DEMONSTRATION_RULE /test/score LOCAL_DEMONSTRATION_RULE 5.0describe LOCAL_DEMONSTRATION_RULE My test rule
I put this in a file named my_rules.cf in
/etc/mail/spamassassin/
and then run
service spamassassin restart
My hi
1 - 100 of 112 matches
Mail list logo
