Title: RE: sa-learn question
This happens to me in 2.63, but my machine is underpowered for the amount of traffic I have. If I feed ~500 spams or ~200 hams at one time, bayes.lock gets reset in the middle of sa-learn, sometimes causes the database to become corrupted.
-Original Message
_
From: Brent Kennedy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Mon 7/12/2004 10:54 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: sa-learn question
I usually like to do things manually myself too, but unfortunately I have
2000+ emails in the folder I would like to get learned as spam. I figured
it might help
0:34 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: SA-learn question
During the time my filter was offline, i used a folder in outlook to store all
the spam messages i got in. I would like to dump that somewhere and import it
into the linux box, then have spamassassin learn it all as spam.
Any suggestions?
.
-Original Message-
From: Paul Hutchings [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, July 12, 2004 1:42 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: sa-learn question
Perhaps I'm along but users do dumb things.. I have a "spam" public folder
(we use Outlook) and usually whenever I look
s it depends on your structure but I prefer a manual process even if
it means it happens a little less often.
Paul
> -Original Message-
> From: kler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, June 23, 2004 2:23 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: sa-learn question
>
During the time my filter was offline, i used a folder in outlook to store all
the spam messages i got in. I would like to dump that somewhere and import it
into the linux box, then have spamassassin learn it all as spam.
Any suggestions?
Thanks for the many advices I got!
I will try the proposed solution with procmail at
http://konabi.de/content.php?action=sa-learn
I think it's really what I was looking for!
Chiara
On Wed, 2004-06-23 at 15:55, Markus Welsch wrote:
> > Hi all,
> > I hope someone can help me. I've searched google
At 09:22 AM 6/23/2004, kler wrote:
We would like to allow users who get spam or ham messages to send
them back the messages to us and run sa-learn through.
Is there a way to make sa-learn analyze only the body of the mail?
(Since the header part comes modified?).
Be careful, the body is likely to b
Hi all,
I hope someone can help me. I've searched google without much chance ...
On a mail server is installed SA 2.63 and we have set up a global bayes
db. We would like to allow users who get spam or ham messages to send
them back the messages to us and run sa-learn through.
Is there a way to ma
Hi all,
I hope someone can help me. I've searched google without much chance ...
On a mail server is installed SA 2.63 and we have set up a global bayes
db. We would like to allow users who get spam or ham messages to send
them back the messages to us and run sa-learn through.
Is there a way to m
On Friday February 20 2004 09:06, Mark A. DeMichele wrote:
> I've been using SA for about a month now without bayes. I think I'm
> ready to try it. I have a question though. Right now my SA is set up
> to modify messages it thinks are spams to have the original message in
> an attachment. Is S
At 09:06 AM 2/20/2004, Mark A. DeMichele wrote:
I've been using SA for about a month now without bayes. I think I'm
ready to try it. I have a question though. Right now my SA is set up to
modify messages it thinks are spams to have the original message in an
attachment. Is SA-Learn smart en
Title: SA-Learn Question
I’ve been using SA for about a month now without bayes. I think I’m ready to try it. I have a question though. Right now my SA is set up to modify messages it thinks are spams to have the original message in an attachment. Is SA-Learn smart enough to recognize
13 matches
Mail list logo
