On Thu, Aug 26, 2004 at 10:23:55AM -0400, Gustafson, Tim wrote:
> Use of uninitialized value at
> /usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.005/Mail/SpamAssassin/Bayes.pm line 549.
> Use of uninitialized value at
> /usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.005/Mail/SpamAssassin/Bayes.pm line 551.
> Use of uninitiali
On Thu, 26 Aug 2004, Gustafson, Tim wrote:
Except that I use the FreeBSD ports for all my installs and upgrades so that
the proper FreeBSD patches get installed. CPAN tends to corrupt my Perl
modules and break things.
I know about switching back and fourth between the two versions of perl in
FreeB
) 480-1870 Mobile/Emergencies
http://www.meitech.com/
-Original Message-
From: Martin Hepworth [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, August 26, 2004 11:20 AM
To: Gustafson, Tim
Subject: Re: Errors While Running sa-learn
Tim
reinstalling the perl modules should be fairly easy (CPAN), a
EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: Re: Errors While Running sa-learn
On Thu, 26 Aug 2004, Gustafson, Tim wrote:
When I run sa-learn on an mbox file, I get the following errors:
Use of uninitialized value at
/usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.005/Mail/SpamAssassin/Bayes.pm line 549.
Use of uninitialized val
Dave Stern - Former Rocket Scientist [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, August 26, 2004 10:47 AM
To: Gustafson, Tim
Cc: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: Re: Errors While Running sa-learn
On Thu, 26 Aug 2004, Gustafson, Tim wrote:
> When I run sa-learn on an mbox file, I get the follo
On Thu, 26 Aug 2004, Gustafson, Tim wrote:
When I run sa-learn on an mbox file, I get the following errors:
Use of uninitialized value at
/usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.005/Mail/SpamAssassin/Bayes.pm line 549.
Use of uninitialized value at
/usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.005/Mail/SpamAssassin
When I run sa-learn on an mbox file, I get the following errors:
Use of uninitialized value at
/usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.005/Mail/SpamAssassin/Bayes.pm line 549.
Use of uninitialized value at
/usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.005/Mail/SpamAssassin/Bayes.pm line 551.
Use of uninitialized
_path /etc/mail/spamassassin/bayes
(I granted the group 'users' write permission to the
/etc/mail/spamassassin/bayes directory.
Whenever i log in as a regular user and run:
sa-learn --spam --mbox ~/mail/Suspected-Spam
It creates a new bayes DB at ~/.spamassassin/bayes/
What am I doing wrong?
Thanks,
JP
Hello LuKreme,
Saturday, August 21, 2004, 7:47:29 AM, you wrote:
>>> But I have had thousands of SPAMS. Apparently, I've only fed 20 of
>>> them for sa-learn. I seem to recall that there is a flag to set for
>>> Bayes to pick up on all Spam messages over a ce
On 18 Aug 2004, at 10:30, Jim Maul wrote:
Quoting Jim Coulter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
OK. Tried the -tD. There is says that my Bayes database only has 20
spams
in it. (<200).
But I have had thousands of SPAMS. Apparently, I've only fed 20 of
them for
sa-learn. I seem to recall
On Thursday 19 August 2004 17:21, Mário Gamito wrote:
>
> By the way, i have about 100 domains and 2500 acounts.
> How could i redirect all SPAM marked messages from all domains to a
> particular folder ?
Ah well, that's 2450 more than I have, so I appreciate the problem of
scale :-) Although I
Hi Dougie,
Dougie Nisbet wrote:
On Thursday 19 August 2004 16:35, Mário Gamito wrote:
Hi,
I've created an account called [EMAIL PROTECTED] and told all my clients
that when they receive a SPAM message not marked as such, to forward it
to that account.
Could you get them to save it to a particular
ome/dougie/Mail/.spam.directory/2learn /tmp/2learn
sudo chmod 777 /tmp/2learn
sa-learn --spam --mbox /tmp/2learn
In kmail it's possible to configure folders to expire mail after a certain
number of days so it is self-regulating in keeping the folder size down too
if you set it
ot /usr/bin/sa-learn --spam
/home/vpopmail/domains/mydomain.com/spam/Maildir/new
But then, it came to my mind, that in this way, the e-mail addresses of
my clients that forwards the messages will be caught in the SA learn fire.
Any ideias how to avoid that, or other way to make it right ?
You cant
Hi,
I've created an account called [EMAIL PROTECTED] and told all my clients
that when they receive a SPAM message not marked as such, to forward it
to that account.
Then, i thought of everyday runnig in crontab, something like:
53 23 * * * root /usr/bin/sa-learn --spam
/home/vpopmail/do
At 12:24 PM 8/18/2004, Jim Coulter wrote:
OK. Tried the -tD. There is says that my Bayes database only has 20 spams
in it. (<200).
But I have had thousands of SPAMS. Apparently, I've only fed 20 of them for
sa-learn. I seem to recall that there is a flag to set for Bayes to pick u
Quoting Jim Coulter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
OK. Tried the -tD. There is says that my Bayes database only has 20 spams
in it. (<200).
But I have had thousands of SPAMS. Apparently, I've only fed 20 of them for
sa-learn. I seem to recall that there is a flag to set for Bayes to
OK. Tried the -tD. There is says that my Bayes database only has 20 spams
in it. (<200).
But I have had thousands of SPAMS. Apparently, I've only fed 20 of them for
sa-learn. I seem to recall that there is a flag to set for Bayes to pick up
on all Spam messages over a certain scor
At 11:18 AM 8/18/2004, Jim Coulter wrote:
If I run a message through sa-learn and then run spamassassin -t on the same
message, shouldn't it be recognized as SPAM ?
If I add a teaspoon of red wine to a 50 gallon barrel of clear water,
should the resulting liquid be red?
Depends on the con
If I run a message through sa-learn and then run spamassassin -t on the same
message, shouldn't it be recognized as SPAM ?
I ran sa-learn --spam mymessage.imap and then ran spamassassin -t <
mymessage.imap but the filter did not reject the message ?
I am using SA 2.63 with Perl 5.80 on a
Matthew Thomas wrote:
>
> While looking into @INC, I saw that sa-learn had a line:
> use lib '/usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.1'
>
> Which I changed to:
> use lib '/usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.4'
>
> And this fixed the problem. I don't know i
) "force install Digest::SHA1"
> 2) go through @INC and delete all Digest::SHA1-related files, then
>"install Digest::SHA1".
1) didn't work.
While looking into @INC, I saw that sa-learn had a line:
use lib '/usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.1'
Which I
On Mon, Aug 09, 2004 at 09:06:44AM -0700, Matthew Thomas wrote:
> I tried reinstalling Digest::SHA1 from CPAN, but it said that the module was
> up to date. I'm using SA 2.64, which I usually upgrade via CPAN, also.
>
> Does anyone have any ideas on how to fix this?
Two options IMO:
1) "force
I upgraded perl on Friday and today discovered a problem with sa-learn. The
error message is below:
# sa-learn --file --spam spam
Use of inherited AUTOLOAD for non-method Digest::SHA1::sha1_hex() is
deprecated at /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.1/Mail/SpamAssassin/SHA1.pm line
57. Learned from 0
Hi.
Downloaded SA 2.64, compiled with no errors, tests all passed but
sa-learn gives some warnings. Using perl 5.6.1 on RedHat 7.3.
# sa-learn --mbox --ham ham040803.mbox
Use of uninitialized value in length at
/usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.6.1/Mail/SpamAssassin/Bayes.pm line 457.
Use of
when trying to run sa-learn
/usr/local/bin/sa-learn -D --spam --mbox $HOME/Mail/TheMailBox
on one of my mailboxes I got:
Cannot open bayes databases /home/*munged*/.spamassassin/bayes_* R/W:
lock failed: Interrupted system call
Learned from 0 message(s) (1 message(s) examined).
ERROR: the Bayes
On Tuesday 27 July 2004 19:14, Ray Dzek wrote:
> Does anyone have a good example of procmail recipies for sending spamtrap
> mail directly to the bayes database?
I tried a couple of ways and in the end created a user 'surespam' and sent it
all there. Overnight I have a cron
everything that comes to them and sending
it straight into sa-learn for our site-wide bayes.
Thanks in advance.
Ray Dzek
Network Operations Supervisor
Specialized Bicycle Components
David Jiménez Domínguez wrote:
Hi list!
To learn from messages (stored like ham or like posible spam with the tag2
score) to Spam, Have I remove the SA headers??
Saludos.
No. It'll ignore them.
By the way, both of your questions today are FAQs:
http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/BayesFaq
--
Hi list!
To learn from messages (stored like ham or like posible spam with the tag2
score) to Spam, Have I remove the SA headers??
Saludos.
bing8D8oRl4RH.bin
Description: PGP Public Key
Title: RE: sa-learn question
This happens to me in 2.63, but my machine is underpowered for the amount of traffic I have. If I feed ~500 spams or ~200 hams at one time, bayes.lock gets reset in the middle of sa-learn, sometimes causes the database to become corrupted.
-Original Message
_
From: Brent Kennedy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Mon 7/12/2004 10:54 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: sa-learn question
I usually like to do things manually myself too, but unfortunately I have
2000+ emails in the folder I would like to get learned as spam. I figured
it might help
0:34 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: SA-learn question
During the time my filter was offline, i used a folder in outlook to store all
the spam messages i got in. I would like to dump that somewhere and import it
into the linux box, then have spamassassin learn it all as spam.
Any suggestions?
.
-Original Message-
From: Paul Hutchings [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, July 12, 2004 1:42 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: sa-learn question
Perhaps I'm along but users do dumb things.. I have a "spam" public folder
(we use Outlook) and usually whenever I look
s it depends on your structure but I prefer a manual process even if
it means it happens a little less often.
Paul
> -Original Message-
> From: kler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, June 23, 2004 2:23 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: sa-learn question
>
During the time my filter was offline, i used a folder in outlook to store all
the spam messages i got in. I would like to dump that somewhere and import it
into the linux box, then have spamassassin learn it all as spam.
Any suggestions?
After upgrading to 3.0 pre1 from 2.63 I am getting the following error
when running sa-learn. Running Redhat 9 server. How can i fix this?
Note, I get the same error in my maillog when trying to autolearn spam/ham.
sa-learn --spam --mbox /var/spool/mail/catchall
# sa-learn --spam --mbox /var
ssage-
From: David B Funk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 07 July 2004 18:31
To: Stephen Gray
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache. Org
Subject: RE: sa-learn
On Wed, 7 Jul 2004, Stephen Gray wrote:
> The header of the mailbox says *mbx* and a conversion program I ran on it
> identified it as mbo
Kris Deugau wrote:
From: "Stephen Gray" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
The mailbox has about 150 e-mails in it but at the end sa-learn
says for example :-
learned from 1 message(s) (3 message(s) examined)
jdow replied:
Aouhm let's see. Is it possible that of the 150 messages only 3 or
t
On Wed, 7 Jul 2004, Stephen Gray wrote:
> The header of the mailbox says *mbx* and a conversion program I ran on it
> identified it as mbox format so I'm not sure. It could of course be in some
> intermediate format that only the imap deamon knows about.
If the first line of the mailbox is just
On Wed, 7 Jul 2004, Mike Burger wrote:
> My experience has been that you need to use "<" to read in the mailbox
> file:
>
> sa-learn --spam --mbox < mailbox_name
No, you do not need that shell I/O redirector -if- the mailbox
is in standard Unix 'mbox
Hello.
>
> The mailbox has about 150 e-mails in it but at the end sa-learn says for
> example :-
>
> learned from 1 message(s) (3 message(s) examined)
>
> So it has only looked at 3 of the 150 for some reason. Sorry if I'm
> misunderstanding here.
> From: "Stephen Gray" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > The mailbox has about 150 e-mails in it but at the end sa-learn
> > says for example :-
> >
> > learned from 1 message(s) (3 message(s) examined)
jdow replied:
> Aouhm let's see. Is it possible tha
ginal Message-
From: Mike Burger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 07 July 2004 13:31
To: Stephen Gray
Cc: Andy Norris; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache. Org
Subject: RE: sa-learn
Silly question, but is the mailbox in question a standard mbox format
mailbox, or perhaps some other format?
On Wed, 7 Jul
> To: Stephen Gray
> Cc: Andy Norris; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache. Org
> Subject: RE: sa-learn
>
>
> My experience has been that you need to use "<" to read in the mailbox
> file:
>
> sa-learn --spam --mbox < mailbox_name
>
> On Wed, 7 Jul 2004, Stephen G
Mike Burger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 07 July 2004 11:22
To: Stephen Gray
Cc: Andy Norris; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache. Org
Subject: RE: sa-learn
My experience has been that you need to use "<" to read in the mailbox
file:
sa-learn --spam --mbox < mailbox_name
On Wed, 7 Ju
My experience has been that you need to use "<" to read in the mailbox
file:
sa-learn --spam --mbox < mailbox_name
On Wed, 7 Jul 2004, Stephen Gray wrote:
> Hello.
>
> The mailbox has about 150 e-mails in it but at the end sa-learn says for
> example :-
>
Hello.
The mailbox has about 150 e-mails in it but at the end sa-learn says for
example :-
learned from 1 message(s) (3 message(s) examined)
So it has only looked at 3 of the 150 for some reason. Sorry if I'm
misunderstanding here.
Regards
Stephen Gray
EMEA Support Manager
K-PAR Arch
Hi Stephen,
sa-learn will only learn from messages it's not already learned from. If
you happen to have run it on these messages already, you're only getting
the new, "unlearned from" messages counted.
sa-learn --spam --mbox mailbox_name
You may need to "unlearn"
Hello.
I am running
spamassassin on an x86 Solaris box and am trying to get sa-learn to read a spam
mailbox. The mailbox has a bout 150 spam messages in it but sa-learn is
just reading the first three messages and ignoring the rest. If I leave
off the --mbox switch, it just reads the
Philip Smolcynski wrote:
Spamassassin is configured to automatically forward incoming mail to
our Notes/Domino SMTP servers. It does not keep any mail. I'm looking
for a way to port spam and ham back to Spamassassin server so that I
can utilize sa-learn. Running version 2.6 on SuSE Linux
Philip Smolcynski wrote:
Spamassassin is configured to automatically forward incoming mail to
our Notes/Domino SMTP servers. It does not keep any mail. I'm looking
for a way to port spam and ham back to Spamassassin server so that I
can utilize sa-learn. Running version 2.6 on SuSE Linux
Spamassassin is configured to automatically
forward incoming mail to our Notes/Domino SMTP servers. It does not keep
any mail. I'm looking for a way to port spam and ham back to Spamassassin
server so that I can utilize sa-learn. Running version 2.6 on SuSE Linux.
Any ideas?
Thanks
P
Scott Wolfe wrote:
No that I am feeding sa-learn from Exchange what are people using to see the
ratio of Ham and Spam in thier Bayes db?
-Scott
sa-learn --dump magic
I run a script overnight like this:-
#!/bin/sh
/usr/bin/sa-learn --force-expire
/usr/bin/sa-learn --rebuild
OP="/var/opt
On Mon, 2004-06-28 at 09:46, Scott Wolfe wrote:
> No that I am feeding sa-learn from Exchange what are people using to see the
> ratio of Ham and Spam in thier Bayes db?
See the man page for sa-learn
Alex
No that I am feeding sa-learn from Exchange what are people using to see the
ratio of Ham and Spam in thier Bayes db?
-Scott
> -Original Message-
> From: Kristopher Austin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 24 June 2004 17:04
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 -> sa-learn??
>
> The real question is if there is a way to automate it,
> especially from a pub
. This script
will logon to any server supporting IMAP, retrieve any messages located
in any arbitrarily named folder, process the contents of that folder as
either ham or spam, delete the processed messages, and then run an
sa-learn --rebuild.
The script is simple to understand, and you nee
On Thursday 24 June 2004 20:08, Matt Kettler wrote:
> At 12:16 PM 6/24/04 +0545, Bikrant wrote:
> >I did spamassasin -t < msg.1 before and after sa-learn --spam msg.1 but I
> > am getting same result score both the times. Why isn't spamassissin using
> > the spam d
When using "sa-learn --spam --mbox " I get
following error (about 100.000 times). What is wrong
with my database ? Is there anything wrong at all ?
How can I fix this ? What shall I do - beside crying ?
Thanks Harald
Error message (spamassassin 2.63):
=
When using sa-learn with --rebuild and --force-expire
I always get an "debug" message (error ?) at the last
line:
Thanks Harald
debug: Syncing Bayes journal and expiring old tokens...
debug: lock: 25566 created
/var/spool/amavis/.spamassassin/bayes.lock.sauron.arnold.at.25566
d
a way
for my users to forward spam and ham to sa-learn effortlessly (as in,
"idiot-resistant"). Many commercial packages offer such a solution;
there's *got* to be a reasonable way to do it with our current setup.
I will, however, look into the fetch solution; it will at least help m
Another option is to use IMAP instead of POP. That way no headers are
added.
RO
- Original Message -
From: "Bill Randle" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, June 24, 2004 1:51 PM
Subject: Re: Exchange 5.5 -> sa-learn??
> I haven&#x
I haven't looked at the messages going into sa-learn. I just figured it
was not a
big impact on the Bayes learning in the big scheme of things. I could be
wrong.
-Bill
Kristopher Austin wrote:
I have been using fetchmail in almost exactly the way you describe.
However, fetchmail deliver
Look at Kristopher Austin's post from earlier today regarding exchange 5.5.
It's a good example on how to use fetchmail to pull messages from your
groupwise spam account and run sa-learn on it. All you have to do is set up
postfix to handle a couple of local accounts, have fetchmail pul
spam. All have helped to improve the catch
ratio, and I'm certain that the Bayes will get better as time goes on.
But I'm not satisfied.
The one thing I'm missing out on is the ability to use sa-learn on
known spam and ham. Since all email is forwarded to the inside, I can't
From: Bill Randle [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, June 24, 2004 11:37 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Exchange 5.5 -> sa-learn??
I use fetchmail for sa-learn from Exchange 5.5.
We have two Public folders on Exchange: spam and ham. In Outlook,
they show up under Public Folders\Al
I use fetchmail for sa-learn from Exchange 5.5.
We have two Public folders on Exchange: spam and ham. In Outlook,
they show up under Public Folders\All Public Folders\ham and
Public Folders\All Public Folders\spam. Users drag and drop
spam and/or ham to one of the folders.
On the Linux box
BTW, imap access to Public folders works also. They are addressed like
"Public Folders/spam" for example.
Combine Mail::IMAPClient and Mail::SpamAssassin mix well and learn away.
-steve halligan
http://www.333tech.com
http://sguil.sf.net
> Interesting suggestion. I haven't thought of that.
>
Interesting suggestion. I haven't thought of that.
Any ideas where to start to learn how to do this in Perl?
Thanks,
Kris
-Original Message-
From: Young, Darren [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, June 24, 2004 11:05 AM
To: Kristopher Austin
Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 ->
-Original Message-
From: Steve Dimoff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, June 24, 2004 10:26 AM
To: Scott Wolfe; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 -> sa-learn??
You could export a PST file of SPAM/HAM and then use a program called
'readpst' to convert into a ma
You could export a PST file of SPAM/HAM and then use a program called
'readpst' to convert into a mailbox file then run sa-learn --ham/spam --mbox
< /path/to/mailbox
http://freshmeat.net/projects/libpst/?branch_id=20789&release_id=102175
Works great for our systems... one thing
large amounts of spam but I
would like to be able to feed sa-learn to achieve better results.
Are there some tools out there to achieve this?
Thanks,
-Scott
At 12:16 PM 6/24/04 +0545, Bikrant wrote:
I did spamassasin -t < msg.1 before and after sa-learn --spam msg.1 but I am
getting same result score both the times. Why isn't spamassissin using the
spam database that has been created using the sa-learn utility ?
It should be.
I think it s
On Thursday 24 June 2004 13:40, Loren Wilton wrote:
> > I did spamassasin -t < msg.1 before and after sa-learn --spam msg.1 but I
>
> am
>
> > getting same result score both the times. Why isn't spamassissin using
> > the spam database that has been created usi
Thanks for the many advices I got!
I will try the proposed solution with procmail at
http://konabi.de/content.php?action=sa-learn
I think it's really what I was looking for!
Chiara
On Wed, 2004-06-23 at 15:55, Markus Welsch wrote:
> > Hi all,
> > I hope someone can help me. I&#
> I did spamassasin -t < msg.1 before and after sa-learn --spam msg.1 but I
am
> getting same result score both the times. Why isn't spamassissin using the
> spam database that has been created using the sa-learn utility ?
It is. Bayes said this message was ham.
> And, ca
I did spamassasin -t < msg.1 before and after sa-learn --spam msg.1 but I am
getting same result score both the times. Why isn't spamassissin using the
spam database that has been created using the sa-learn utility ?
I think it should be given significantly high score once it is decla
What's the best way to use sa-learn on spam/ham from Thunderbird pop3?
I recently switched from Outlook and am not sure what to do in Thunderbird.
I'd been using readpst (from libpst) - which converts exported .pst
files to mbox format.
Also, since I've switched to Thunderbird,
At 09:22 AM 6/23/2004, kler wrote:
We would like to allow users who get spam or ham messages to send
them back the messages to us and run sa-learn through.
Is there a way to make sa-learn analyze only the body of the mail?
(Since the header part comes modified?).
Be careful, the body is likely to
Hi all,
I hope someone can help me. I've searched google without much chance ...
On a mail server is installed SA 2.63 and we have set up a global bayes
db. We would like to allow users who get spam or ham messages to send
them back the messages to us and run sa-learn through.
Is there a w
Hi all,
I hope someone can help me. I've searched google without much chance ...
On a mail server is installed SA 2.63 and we have set up a global bayes
db. We would like to allow users who get spam or ham messages to send
them back the messages to us and run sa-learn through.
Is there a w
He created a new bayes database for test purposes, and the first thing he
did was the sa-learn on those mailboxes. That's why I don't understand how
it skipped those messages if it is a new database
-Original Message-
From: Theo Van Dinter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tue
At 07:23 PM 6/21/2004, Steve wrote:
Hey, im new to spamassassin but im told this abnormal and to post here,
when I
run sa-learn --mbox --spam /home/freedom/kmail/spam I get:
Learned from 11 message(s) (40 message(s) examined).
why would 40 msgs be exculded? they are all spam msgs.
Do you have
On Tue, 22 Jun 2004 02:23:29 + Steve <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hey, im new to spamassassin but im told this abnormal and to post here, when
> I
> run sa-learn --mbox --spam /home/freedom/kmail/spam I get:
> Learned from 11 message(s) (40 message(s) examined).
>
&
On 2004-06-22 02:23:29 +, Steve wrote:
> Hey, im new to spamassassin but im told this abnormal and to post here, when
> I
> run sa-learn --mbox --spam /home/freedom/kmail/spam I get:
> Learned from 11 message(s) (40 message(s) examined).
>
> why would 40 msgs be exculded?
On Mon, 2004-06-21 at 19:23, Steve wrote:
> why would 40 msgs be exculded? they are all spam msgs.
Has the mailbox been learned before? sa-learn only learns from a given
message once.
--
John Hardin KA7OHZ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Internal Systems Admi
Steve <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hey, im new to spamassassin but im told this abnormal and to post here, when
> I
> run sa-learn --mbox --spam /home/freedom/kmail/spam I get:
> Learned from 11 message(s) (40 message(s) examined).
>
> why would 40 msgs be exculded
On Tue, Jun 22, 2004 at 02:23:29AM +, Steve wrote:
> Learned from 11 message(s) (40 message(s) examined).
>
> why would 40 msgs be exculded? they are all spam msgs.
It didn't exclude/skip 40, it skipped 29 (40-11). As for why, it'll do
that if you've already learned the message (autolearn fo
Hey, im new to spamassassin but im told this abnormal and to post here, when I
run sa-learn --mbox --spam /home/freedom/kmail/spam I get:
Learned from 11 message(s) (40 message(s) examined).
why would 40 msgs be exculded? they are all spam msgs.
running:
GNU/Linux 2.4.22
Slack 9.1 i686
On 2004-06-21 18:37:07 -0800, John Andersen wrote:
> Abuse? Abuse?!!
http://rhols66.adsl.netsonic.fi/era/unix/award.html
HTH. HAND.
Martin
--
Martin Schröder, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ArtCom GmbH, Lise-Meitner-Str 5, 28359 Bremen, Germany
Voice +49 421 20419-44 /
Hi Matt
Matt Kettler wrote:
At 01:24 AM 6/22/04 +0200, Matthias Keller wrote:
As I'm pretty much hand-feeding every spam my bayes will ever see I
noticed (and I think that's worse now in 2.63 than it was in 2.55)
that sa-learn always needs ages just to perform a
cat spam.txt | sa-le
Hi Matt
Matt Kettler wrote:
At 01:24 AM 6/22/04 +0200, Matthias Keller wrote:
As I'm pretty much hand-feeding every spam my bayes will ever see I
noticed (and I think that's worse now in 2.63 than it was in 2.55)
that sa-learn always needs ages just to perform a
cat spam.txt | sa-le
At 06:37 PM 6/21/04 -0800, John Andersen wrote:
> Why are you abusing pipes like that? sa-learn can accept filenames, no
> need to pipe things to it.
>
> sa-learn -spam spam.txt
Abuse? Abuse?!!
Why are you mistakeing someone's deviation from your OPINION on how to do
things fo
On Monday 21 June 2004 18:35, Matt Kettler wrote:
> >cat spam.txt | sa-learn --spam
>
> Why are you abusing pipes like that? sa-learn can accept filenames, no
> need to pipe things to it.
>
> sa-learn -spam spam.txt
Abuse? Abuse?!!
Why are you mistakeing someone's d
At 01:24 AM 6/22/04 +0200, Matthias Keller wrote:
As I'm pretty much hand-feeding every spam my bayes will ever see I
noticed (and I think that's worse now in 2.63 than it was in 2.55) that
sa-learn always needs ages just to perform a
cat spam.txt | sa-learn --spam
Why are you abusing
Jesse Houwing writes:
Matthias Keller wrote:
i
As I'm pretty much hand-feeding every spam my bayes will ever see I
noticed (and I think that's worse now in 2.63 than it was in 2.55)
that sa-learn always needs ages just to perform a
cat spam.txt | sa-learn --spam
when running top
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jesse Houwing writes:
> Matthias Keller wrote:
>
> > Hi
> >
> > As I'm pretty much hand-feeding every spam my bayes will ever see I
> > noticed (and I think that's worse now in 2.63 than it was in 2.55)
>
Matthias Keller wrote:
Hi
As I'm pretty much hand-feeding every spam my bayes will ever see I
noticed (and I think that's worse now in 2.63 than it was in 2.55)
that sa-learn always needs ages just to perform a
cat spam.txt | sa-learn --spam
when running top I see that during the ti
Hi
As I'm pretty much hand-feeding every spam my bayes will ever see I
noticed (and I think that's worse now in 2.63 than it was in 2.55) that
sa-learn always needs ages just to perform a
cat spam.txt | sa-learn --spam
when running top I see that during the time it just sits there a
1 - 100 of 268 matches
Mail list logo
