I've done some work on displaying more detailed statistics in the Outlook
plugin. Attached is a screenshot of my current statistics. You'll notice
that I've also added some accuracy stats to the stats that have already been
discussed. These are based on the "spam batting average" concept recentl
In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
"Seth Goodman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> From: Barry Warsaw
>> Sent: Friday, December 03, 2004 9:10 AM
>>
>>
>> On Fri, 2004-12-03 at 02:32, Seth Goodman wrote:
>>
>> > Automatic posts to the list makes it unwise to require subscription. I
>> > di
On Fri, 2004-12-03 at 16:08, Skip Montanaro wrote:
> Barry> I sure wish Mailman did a mail-back confirmation for non-member
> Barry> postings. I also wish I knew someone who could do something
> Barry> about that .
>
> Don't mail-back confirmations just help overload the net? Maybe I
Barry> I sure wish Mailman did a mail-back confirmation for non-member
Barry> postings. I also wish I knew someone who could do something
Barry> about that .
Don't mail-back confirmations just help overload the net? Maybe I
misunderstand what the term means.
Skip
This is an automated message. I am on permanent vacation and will
probably not read your message. However, this auto-posting address now
uses Spambayes which is a virtually flawless system
for separating legitimate email (called "ham") from spam. Spambayes has
determined that this message is:
[Barry Warsaw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>]
> BTW, I tend to agree. I sure wish Mailman did a mail-back
> confirmation for non-member postings. I also wish I knew
> someone who could do something about that .
I've been thinking about that, and have come to believe that the
difficulty is mostly due to you
On Fri, 2004-12-03 at 10:51, Skip Montanaro wrote:
> "scare" is maybe not the right verb. I think most people are too busy to
> bother subscribing just to ask a question.
BTW, I tend to agree. I sure wish Mailman did a mail-back confirmation
for non-member postings. I also wish I knew someone
[Tony Meyer]
> ...
> I wouldn't care if spambayes-dev required membership in order to
> post,
Me neither.
> but I'm definitely -1 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Me too. The spambayes user list gets messages from people whose
technical knowledge approaches 0 (and, sometimes, appears to approach
0 from th
> From: Barry Warsaw
> Sent: Friday, December 03, 2004 9:10 AM
>
>
> On Fri, 2004-12-03 at 02:32, Seth Goodman wrote:
>
> > Automatic posts to the list makes it unwise to require subscription. I
> > didn't realize you had that feature as I use the Outlook plug-in.
>
> You can whitelist the auto-po
Tony> Requiring registration for [EMAIL PROTECTED] would break the
Tony> ability to automatically submit a problem report that sb_server
Tony> offers (and Outlook may offer in the future). I don't have the
Tony> data, but I suspect that a great many of the people that report
T
On Fri, 2004-12-03 at 02:32, Seth Goodman wrote:
> Automatic posts to the list makes it unwise to require subscription. I
> didn't realize you had that feature as I use the Outlook plug-in.
You can whitelist the auto-posting address though.
-Barry
signature.asc
Description: This is a digital
11 matches
Mail list logo
