In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
"Seth Goodman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> From: T. Alexander Popiel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Sent: Monday, January 10, 2005 4:36 PM
>
><...>
>
>> PS. No, I'm not willing to not have a secondary MX. My primary does
>> crash occasionally, tho
In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
"Seth Goodman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> From: T. Alexander Popiel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Sent: Monday, January 10, 2005 4:36 PM
>
><...>
>
>> Unfortunately, bouncing spam after acceptance is increasingly unavoidable
>> for anyone who has a b
In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Neil Schemenauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>On Mon, Jan 10, 2005 at 02:35:39PM -0800, T. Alexander Popiel wrote:
>> When the primary then rejects the message from the secondary, the
>> secondary is stuck trying to deliver a DSN.
>
>You really should n
> From: T. Alexander Popiel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, January 10, 2005 4:36 PM
<...>
> PS. No, I'm not willing to not have a secondary MX. My primary does
> crash occasionally, though (thankfully) not as much as it used to
> before I replaced the motherboard.
If you can'
> From: T. Alexander Popiel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, January 10, 2005 4:36 PM
<...>
> Unfortunately, bouncing spam after acceptance is increasingly unavoidable
> for anyone who has a backup MX host as insurance against their primary
> host being down.
Anyone who runs a secondary
On Mon, Jan 10, 2005 at 02:35:39PM -0800, T. Alexander Popiel wrote:
> When the primary then rejects the message from the secondary, the
> secondary is stuck trying to deliver a DSN.
You really should not generate DSNs, IMHO. They will very likely be
sent to forged From addresses. In that case,
Tony Meyer wrote:
> [Kenny Pitt]
>> I trained an Unsure message this morning and was surprised
>> that the score didn't seem to change after it was moved back
>> to my Inbox.
>
> Ok, this ought to be fixed now. Apologies for the delay - fixing my
> Outlook install (dead profile, corrupted mapi32.
In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
"Seth Goodman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>Bouncing spam after acceptance is a real problem, even though false
>positives would still get a DSN. The problem is that in the majority of
>spam, both the MAIL FROM: and the From: addresses are forged. S
[Kenny Pitt]
> I trained an Unsure message this morning and was surprised
> that the score didn't seem to change after it was moved back
> to my Inbox.
Ok, this ought to be fixed now. Apologies for the delay - fixing my Outlook
install (dead profile, corrupted mapi32.dll) took longer than expect
> From: Neil Schemenauer
> Sent: Monday, January 10, 2005 2:01 PM
<...>
> I now have a SMTP reverse proxy that uses Spambayes and a
> CDB database. Bouncing high scoring spam is necessary for me
> because I can't review it all.
That's great! I hope when you say "bounce" you actually mean rejec
On Mon, Jan 10, 2005 at 07:20:30PM +0100, Joerg Lenneis wrote:
> I have noticed from CVS that sb_mailsort.py is somewhat dated now,
> with the last update about 5 months ago.
That's because it's such high quality code. ;-)
> There are a couple of things that might be useful, like being able
> to
Dear all,
I have only last week started to use Spambayes and I am very impressed
so far. This is my first attempt at spam filtering. I finally gave up,
my mail address has been around and used for ages, so without
filtering I get an insane amount of spam. I feared a not insignificant
number of fal
12 matches
Mail list logo
