[Andrew]
>> At what point is SPAMBayes sufficiently trained?
[Alex]
> First, spambayes tends to work better when trained with
> similar amounts of spam and ham; you've currently got about a
> 4:1 ratio. I'd suggest retraining with closer to a 1:1 ratio,
> and turning off training while filterin
In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
"From Concept To Reality, L.L.C." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>Greetings one and all:
>
>At what point is SPAMBayes sufficiently trained?
Spambayes is sufficiently trained when you are satisfied with its
performance. ;-) Really, there is no absolute r
Greetings one and all:
At what point is SPAMBayes sufficiently trained?
Clarification:
Ham cutoff: 0.2
Spam cutoff: 0.65
Mine the received headers: Yes
Replace non-ascii characters: Yes
Summarise email prefixes: Yes
Summarise email suffixes: Yes
Train when filtering: Yes
Total emails trained: Spa
