Re: [spamdyke-users] Databases revisited

2009-10-21 Thread Jake Briggs
Eric Shubert wrote: > lenn...@wu-wien.ac.at wrote: >> Dear all, >> >> I have been reading up on the discussions on this list as well as the >> concerns about databases in the FAQ. Whilst I concur with most of the >> points wrt. to a fully fledged SQL database, I think that CDBs are >> ideally sui

Re: [spamdyke-users] Can't avoid spam check after auth

2009-10-21 Thread Eric Shubert
Jorge Minassian wrote: > Hello, > > I am en *very* new user of spamdyke. > I reached it looking for how to avoid Qmail (in a Plesk enviroment) > mark own users as spam altough they get authenticated. > I could install and get all working. > But what I see is that incoming mail (from genuine use

Re: [spamdyke-users] Databases revisited

2009-10-21 Thread Eric Shubert
lenn...@wu-wien.ac.at wrote: > Dear all, > > I have been reading up on the discussions on this list as well as the > concerns about databases in the FAQ. Whilst I concur with most of the > points wrt. to a fully fledged SQL database, I think that CDBs are > ideally suited for the purposes of spamd

[spamdyke-users] Can't avoid spam check after auth

2009-10-21 Thread Jorge Minassian
Hello, I am en *very* new user of spamdyke. I reached it looking for how to avoid Qmail (in a Plesk enviroment) mark own users as spam altough they get authenticated. I could install and get all working. But what I see is that incoming mail (from genuine users) still is getting high level of