I'm not a savvy programmer, so consider that when reading my comments. On 10/23/2009 spamdyke-users-requ...@spamdyke.org wrote:
> I'm thinking that no database might just be the best for this > particular application (spamdyke). > > I don't know where people get the idea that databases provide better > performance than a native filesystem. The database is implemented on > top of a native filesystem after all. ;) I think there is some joking about such an argument. Short of trying it out both ways, who is to know? > > If someone is really interested in speed, why not simply put > spamdyke's config file(s) on a ram drive? Would that materially speed things up? I don't know. I remember when Sam opted for no config file over just command line arguments. As I understood it, the config file might be too slow. Is the config file approach taken now because it doesn't slow things up much or where the command line arguments exceeding the max allowed by *nix? _______________________________________________ spamdyke-users mailing list spamdyke-users@spamdyke.org http://www.spamdyke.org/mailman/listinfo/spamdyke-users
