Re: [spamdyke-users] Greylisting effectiveness?

2012-07-11 Thread Peter Palmreuther
Am 10.07.2012 um 01:08 schrieb Sam Clippinger: > > I just ran a few quick greps on my own server's logs for today [...] Just for the record I did a little math on my greylist cleanup log files of this year. As for all stats it's value lies in the eye of the beer^h^hholder: I have an average del

Re: [spamdyke-users] Greylisting effectiveness?

2012-07-11 Thread Sam Clippinger
That spameatingmonkey.net list is a great tip! There used to be one called "Day Old Bread" that did that same thing but it's been offline for a while and I had never found a replacement. -- Sam Clippinger On Jul 11, 2012, at 1:15 PM, Gary Gendel wrote: > On 7/11/12 1:50 PM, Eric Shubert wr

Re: [spamdyke-users] Greylisting effectiveness?

2012-07-11 Thread Gary Gendel
On 7/11/12 1:50 PM, Eric Shubert wrote: > On 07/11/2012 10:40 AM, BC wrote: >> On 7/11/2012 11:00 AM, spamdyke-users-requ...@spamdyke.org wrote: >>> I've disabled graylisting on a few domains that are sensitive to timely >>> delivery. They haven't complained about any increase in spam. You might >>

Re: [spamdyke-users] Greylisting effectiveness?

2012-07-11 Thread Eric Shubert
On 07/11/2012 10:40 AM, BC wrote: > > On 7/11/2012 11:00 AM, spamdyke-users-requ...@spamdyke.org wrote: >> I've disabled graylisting on a few domains that are sensitive to timely >> delivery. They haven't complained about any increase in spam. You might >> try doing the same to see the effect. >> >

Re: [spamdyke-users] Greylisting effectiveness?

2012-07-11 Thread BC
On 7/11/2012 11:00 AM, spamdyke-users-requ...@spamdyke.org wrote: > I've disabled graylisting on a few domains that are sensitive to timely > delivery. They haven't complained about any increase in spam. You might > try doing the same to see the effect. > > I expect that the various rDNS filters,

Re: [spamdyke-users] Greylisting effectiveness?

2012-07-11 Thread Sam Clippinger
Actually, graylist files are created empty when the first rejection is done. If the sender tries again and the connection is allowed, spamdyke puts the IP address and rDNS name of the remote server into the file. So comparing the number of zero-byte files to non-zero-byte files would give a nu