* Chris Boulton [100712 11:02]:
> Setup is as follows:
>
> ~$ cat /var/qmail/control/rcpthosts
> example.com
>
> ~$ cat /etc/spamdyke/spamdyke.conf
> local-domains-file=/var/qmail/control/rcpthosts
> relay-level=normal
> smtp-auth-level=observe
>
> ~$ telnet localhost smtp
show your tcp.smtp f
* Marcin Orlowski [100126 00:13]:
> Hi,
>
> Apologies for partially off-topic thread, however not spamdyke
> but qmail/spam related.
>
> I recently noticed increased number of what I call "BCC Spam".
> It looks like From: is external, To: is local user (so mail
> is accepted) but there're also e
* Jorge R. Constenla [091023 08:57]:
> Hi,
>
> Spamdyke is great and blocks the 90% of Spam in our MXs servers.
> But we need another filter to block the rest of the spam. We receive
> more than 1M SMTP connections per day for many domains.
>
> Any recommendations ?
what features are you prese
* Sam Clippinger [091022 21:55]:
> What are the permissions on the copy you made in /bin? On my server,
> vchkpw is owned by root and is marked setuid. You might need to do the
> same thing.
-rwx--x--x 1 root root 192612 Sep 29 10:32 /bin/vchkpw
i will try with setuid root t'mmrow morning.
* Sam Clippinger [090929 08:53]:
> The script you posted did not include any details about which user is
> running tcpserver, but it looks like that user does not have permission
qmaild.
> to run /home/vpopmail/bin/vchkpw. If that file's mode is 711, take a
> look at the permissions on the f
* Sam Clippinger [090928 22:13]:
> I think the problem is the argument to the "smtp-auth-command"
> parameter. Because there is a space between "vchkpw" and "/bin/true",
> spamdyke doesn't know they should both be part of the
> "smtp-auth-command". When an incoming connection starts, spamdyke
* David Bo Jensen [090926 08:12]:
> What is
> ls -la /home/vpopmail/bin/vchkpw
-rwx--x--x 1 vpopmail vchkpw 190656 Nov 24 2007 /home/vpopmail/bin/vchkpw
> and what is the user for the tcpserver?
qmaild
> You have no configuration file for spamdyke, and I have learned that
> access-file and
hello,
i am trying smtp auth with spamdyke first time. previously i had used dr.
hoffman's smtp auth patch on few other servers, but frankly i am a bit
old-fashioned, preferring pop-before-smtp over smtp-auth.
i have netqmail-1.05 (lwq style) install with john simpson's validrcptto.cdb
path
and v
* Eric Shubert [090826 21:09]:
> It'd be nice if there was a spamdyke tool that would allow one to easily
> re-check an IP address to see if their server has subsequently been
> fixed, as an aid in keeping the whitelist clean. Sort of a "if a certain
> IP address were to send an email to my ser
* Christoph Kuhle (Expat Email Ltd) [090826 18:02]:
> I am registered with barracuda, but I had heard before that barracuda can
> reject a fair number of genuine emails (I never remember if that is a false
nope, for me the false positive rate of uceprotect was more.
> negative or a false positiv
* Christoph Kuhle (Expat Email Ltd) [090826 13:27]:
> I have spamdyke, with Atomic Secured Linux as well, protecting a server, and
> it works well generally, stopping about 50% of emails (I note that some
> people have reported 90+% Spam statistics). I have just run a DNSStuff
> Anti-Spam Filteri
* Kulkarni Shantanu [090819 10:52]:
> Now I get,
> 2009-08-18 15:22:18.767724500 spamdyke[26765]: FILTER_WHITELIST_NAME ip:
> 203.197.88.122 rdns: colo-122-88-197-203.balasai.com file:
> /var/qmail/control/rdns-whitelist-file(17)
> 2009-08-18 15:22:19.590587500 spamdyke[26765
gt; file. I thought I was the only one, using the command line options in
> the test scripts. :)
>
> -- Sam Clippinger
>
> Kulkarni Shantanu wrote:
> > Hello,
> > I am using spamdyke happily for years now. my run file has,
> >
> > /usr/local/bin/tcpserver .
Hello,
I am using spamdyke happily for years now. my run file has,
/usr/local/bin/tcpserver ... \
/var/qmail/bin/spamdyke408 -g /var/qmail/spamdyke/graylist408/ \
--graylist-level always-create-dir --local-domains-file
/var/qmail/control/graylisteddomains \
--graylist-exception-ip-file /var/qmail
* Stefan Pausch [090604 21:50]:
> My .qmail configuration:
>
> | true
> | /usr/bin/deliverquota ./Maildir
Shouldn't there be a trailing "/" - ./Maildir/
Don't know what deliverquota is, but if it is suid, you might want to
check its perms.
Shantanu
--
www.shantanukulkarni.org
Why don't you renew the domain for a longer period, instead of just 1
year?
Shantanu
--
* Sam Clippinger [090505 22:32]:
> Apologies to all for the domain name issues this morning. I had made a
> note that spamdyke.org was due to expire on 5/9 but that was incorrect
> -- it actually expired
Sam, you might want to look at,
http://qmail.jms1.net/scripts/mkvalidrcptto.shtml
for additional help. The source is in easy perl and commented.
Shantanu
--
* Sam Clippinger [090429 11:33]:
> Yes. The feature uses the same logic used by qmail's processes to
> determine if a recipient is valid
* Keith Dickinson [090428 10:00]:
> Is there a way to give a range of IP's? Like 209.153.64.0/18 or
> 209.153.64-127?
Yes - see for details,
http://spamdyke.org/documentation/README_ip_file_format.html
Shantanu
--
___
spamdyke-users mailing list
spam
* Raj Kumar [090313 12:07]:
>
> Hi to All,
> i am getting this error in logs,
> so what to do.to apply all filter from these files.
>
> ERROR: ignoring file content past line 65536: /var/qmail/control/badmailfrom
> @400049b9ef3e02682854 spamdyke[7785]: ERROR: ignoring file content
>
* slamp slamp [090306 08:41]:
> can the option be disabled or say graylist-max-secs=never ? can
> someone tell me why one should set a timeout for graylisting?
please see,
http://www.spamdyke.org/documentation/README.html
you require specifically,
| Invalidate graylist entries after they are SE
* Raj Kumar [090305 12:36]:
>
> and please help me to resolve/how to solve this.
>
> spamdyke[13486]: ERROR: ignoring file content past line 65536:
> /var/qmail/control/badmailfrom
> spamdyke[13486]: ERROR: ignoring file content past line 65536:
> /var/qmail/control/ipblklist
please read
http:/
; [mailto:spamdyke-users-boun...@spamdyke.org] On Behalf Of Kulkarni Shantanu
> Sent: Friday, February 27, 2009 12:23
> To: spamdyke-users@spamdyke.org
> Subject: [spamdyke-users] spam analysis
>
> Hi,
> i am happily using spamdyke on few of my mail servers. i have put a small
>
Hi,
i am happily using spamdyke on few of my mail servers. i have put a small page
on
comparison of some easy spam blocking ways. please do check it out at,
http://www.shantanukulkarni.org/spam_analysis.html
Shantanu
--
___
spamdyke-users mailing li
* Christian Aust [090211 20:13]:
> Hi,
>
> is it possible to use qmail adress extensions with spamdyke? Regards,
yes, why do you think otherwise?
Shantanu
--
___
spamdyke-users mailing list
spamdyke-users@spamdyke.org
http://www.spamdyke.org/mailman
vel domain...
> >
> > Regards,
> > Chris
> >
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: djbw...@shantanukulkarni.org
> > [mailto:spamdyke-users-boun...@spamdyke.org] On Behalf Of Kulkarni Shantanu
> > Sent: Friday, January 09, 2009 7:17 PM
> > To: spamdyk
Hi,
I am happily using greylisting feature of spamdyke. But I have a small
issue. Many big domains like gmail, yahoo, hotmail, rediffmail do not
retry delivery soon after been greylisted. This results in mails from
those domains delayed a lot. Also, the domains have many outgoing IPs,
so cannot whi
Hello,
Upgraded to this version a few hours back. Seems to work like a charm so
far. Thanks Sam and Felix for all the help.
Shantanu
--
* Sam Clippinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [081020 21:29]:
> spamdyke version 4.0.7 is now available:
> http://www.spamdyke.org/
>
> This version adds the work
27 matches
Mail list logo
