>>
>>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: spamdyke-users-boun...@spamdyke.org
>> [mailto:spamdyke-users-boun...@spamdyke.org] On Behalf Of P.V.Anthony
>> Sent: Wednesday, January 25, 2012 11:11 PM
>> To: spamdyke-users@spamdyke.org
>> Subject: Re: [spamdyke-
hello, the list is active? the las day never arrive any mail from spamdyke list.
please reply ,
best regards.
Pablo G
___
spamdyke-users mailing list
spamdyke-users@spamdyke.org
http://www.spamdyke.org/mailman/listinfo/spamdyke-users
Hello friends, I tried the new utility header blacklist in my config
file works fine spamdyke.conf with the option "header-blacklist-entry
= Subject: Cialis" but when I do it with-blacklist-file header does
not filter, I should mention I have included in the entry
spamdyke.conf header-blacklist-fil
[1062]: ALLOWED from: (unknown) to:
s.meredithx...@domain.cl origin_ip: 206.222.1.5 origin_rdns:
mail.ee.net auth: (unknown) encryption: (none)
Exist any solutions for this problems ?
Regards
Pablo Gonzalez A
___
spamdyke-users mailing list
At least to me with spf, spamdyke, simscan and clamav is enough to
stop the spam, I use spamassassin and dspam cpu time consuming
especially when I have to run up to 5000 email accounts.
Regards.
Pablo González A.
On 11 November 2010 19:44, nightduke wrote:
> I like Qmailtoaster it's easy and p
.
I think that's enough, synchronize the folder graylist not worth it
when it falls to the B server it replaced for a short time does not
affect me so much of graylist.
Regards,
Pablo Gonzalez A
--- Version Spanish--
Tiempo sin verte mira yo acabo de terminar mi configuracion de
cluster qm
Hi all,
I have qmailtoaster in my server + new spamdyke 4.1.0
after upgrade spamdyke I see the /var/log/maillog and show the next message:
ERROR: unable to read from SSL/TLS stream: The connection was
unexpectedly ended/closed
whats the problems? It is Normal this error?
any solutions or fix
message is normal?
Thanks for their comments,
Pablo Gonzalez A.
2010/7/3 Eric Shubert :
> Sam Clippinger wrote:
>> In celebration of this weekend's very important birthday, namely my own,
>> spamdyke version 4.1.0 is now available:
>> http://www.spamdyke.org/
>
Hello friends, somebody know if you can reject messages without the
sender with spamdyke if possible anyone has some tips to do it?
thanks
Pablo Gonzalez A
___
spamdyke-users mailing list
spamdyke-users@spamdyke.org
http://www.spamdyke.org/mailman
> If you want to whitelist this hosts rdns you need to ask the provider to
> setup
> reverse dns for that IP.
>
> Andreas
>
>
> Am Freitag, 19. Dezember 2008 schrieb Pablo Gonzalez:
>
> > Thanks Andreas,
> >
> > I have tested with whitelist_ip ,
Thanks Andreas,
I have tested with whitelist_ip ,it yes it works!!! but with options
allowed e-mail and bipass the filters spamdyke, my interesting is look
work whitelist_rdns , what is the correct sintaxis on the file
whitelist_rdns?
Best Regards,
Pablo
On 19/12/2008, a...@unet.de wrote:
> H
Hi guys, I have a problem with whitelist_rdns ,My spamdyke runnig is
spamdyke-3.1.8 + qmail configuration based in qmailrocks, activate few
days ago the options reject-empty-rdns and
reject-unresolvable-rdns, the questions is I have a domain I need
include in the whitelist_rdns but it does not wo
localhost domain.
Thanks any help
Pablo
2008/5/20 Sam Clippinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Could you enable full logging (with "full-log-dir") and send me the log
> from a failed Eudora connection? Have you tried running spamdyke's
> "config-test" featu
your smtp_psa configuration at /etc/xinetd.d
>
> Also you must add a few things at spamdyke.conf then it will work but no ssl.
>
> Nightduke
>
>
> 2008/5/20 Pablo Gonzalez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> Hi guys, I have a problem with spamdyke-3.1.6 with 7.1 Eudora mail
>
Hi guys, I have a problem with spamdyke-3.1.6 with 7.1 Eudora mail
clients, accuse problem in TLS / SSL and I do not enable
authentication, outlook with no problem.
If I turn off my spamdyke configuration qmailrocks client Eudora works
smoothly, someone knows that it can be happening?
mi spamdyke
MAIL PROTECTED]>:
>>
>> I'm sorry, I just don't understand your question.
>>
>> -- Sam Clippinger
>>
>> Pablo Gonzalez wrote:
>> > Hello Sam,
>> >
>> > I hope that these well and I pointed out to spamdyke 4.0 beta tester,
&
this happens?
a possible bug?
config: qmailrocks+centos 5+spamdyke_3.1.6
Sorry my bad english.
Best regards
Pablo Gonzalez A.
___
spamdyke-users mailing list
spamdyke-users@spamdyke.org
http://www.spamdyke.org/mailman/listinfo/spamdyke-users
Filter mails without the sender
As can be done, I reach hundreds of emails without referring dese different
directions, as I filter? Any idea
Pablo González A.
___
spamdyke-users mailing list
spamdyke-users@spamdyke.org
http://www.spamdyke.org/mailman/
gt;
> This version fixes the 100% CPU bug. This was a very tricky little bug
> to reproduce -- thanks to Pablo Gonzalez and Paolo for reporting this
> one and helping me debug it. Solaris compiling is also fixed. Again.
> Thanks to Davide Bozzelli for reporting this one.
>
> There
> >
> >[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > SMTP error from remote mailer after RCPT TO:< [EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > host mx0.gmx.net [213.165.64.100]: 550 5.1.1 <
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]>... User is unknown {mx021}
> >
> > -- This is a copy of th
Spamdyke problem 3.1.3
Hi guys, I have my installation of qmail based qmailrocks centos 5 + and
have the problem that there is a process that calls vpopmail spamdyke which
remains stuck at 100% while maintaining the use of processor, increasing the
load average on my server
Any ideas?
Thanks
Pa
2.168.11.0/255.255.255.0
>
> -- Sam Clippinger
>
> Pablo Gonzalez wrote:
> > Hello friends, a happy new year 2008 to all of you!
> > My query is added as an authorized network segment in the whitelist_ip
> > option?
> > 192.168.11.0 <http://192.168.11.0>? 192.168.11.
Hello friends, a happy new year 2008 to all of you!
My query is added as an authorized network segment in the whitelist_ip
option?
192.168.11.0? 192.168.11.0/16? 192.168.11?
What is the correct way?
Best regards,
Pablo González A.
___
spamdyke-users m
23 matches
Mail list logo
