Re: [spamdyke-users] 0byte graylist entries

2013-12-30 Thread Peter Palmreuther
Hello Christoph, Am 17.12.2013 um 11:36 schrieb emailitis.com : > I would like to delete any files that are 0 bytes in size AND are over 3 days > old. I tried to be clever: > find /var/qmail/graylist/beadonbrook.com/. -type f -size 0 -mtime +3 –print > (missed out the –delete until I had checke

Re: [spamdyke-users] Blocking mails with headers containing multiple addresses in From:

2012-12-11 Thread Peter Palmreuther
Am 10.12.2012 um 13:43 schrieb Marcin Orlowski : > Peter Palmreuther wrote on 2012-12-09 17:18: > >> If the MUA is working correctly it should behave like this (or similar), >> because as stated it's perfectly legal to have multiple addresses in "From:" >

Re: [spamdyke-users] Blocking mails with headers containing multiple addresses in From:

2012-12-09 Thread Peter Palmreuther
Hello, PMFJI. Am 09.12.2012 um 01:18 schrieb Sam Clippinger : > How interesting. I wonder why they're doing that Whatever the answer to this question might be ... It's perfectly legal to do this. RFC 5322, sec. 3.6.2 explicitly states "The from field consists of the field name "From" and a

Re: [spamdyke-users] Greylisting effectiveness?

2012-07-11 Thread Peter Palmreuther
Am 10.07.2012 um 01:08 schrieb Sam Clippinger: > > I just ran a few quick greps on my own server's logs for today [...] Just for the record I did a little math on my greylist cleanup log files of this year. As for all stats it's value lies in the eye of the beer^h^hholder: I have an average del

Re: [spamdyke-users] Graylist performance

2012-07-08 Thread Peter Palmreuther
Hi, Am 07.07.2012 um 21:01 schrieb Eric Shubert: > Looking at the log messages, I see "from: (unknown)" in some cases. I > presume that this is the envelope sender, while the message/internal > sender is used for the graylist entries. Hopefully not. I haven't had a look at the code recently, bu

Re: [spamdyke-users] SMTP-Auth and filter Question

2011-12-21 Thread Peter Palmreuther
Him Am 21.12.2011 um 21:49 schrieb Jorge R Constenla: > > Spamdyke will disable all of its filters for authenticated connections. Why? Because authenticated users are considered to be "trusted" and spamdyke tries to put limitations on untrusted message senders? > Would be great if some filter

Re: [spamdyke-users] Followed install to the letter.....but all outside email blocked

2011-12-18 Thread Peter Palmreuther
Am 18.12.2011 um 17:15 schrieb Kevin: > Sorry to bother everyone with this but when I enable SpamDyke in the smtp_psa > config all outside email is blocked. What message (to the sender) mails are blocked with? > I've also turned on logging but don't see anything being written. Not even normal m

Re: [spamdyke-users] New install Blocking all outside email

2011-12-18 Thread Peter Palmreuther
Am 18.12.2011 um 04:47 schrieb Kevin Miller: > > This is my smtp_psa entry. > I have a feeling it has something do with the placement if the spamdyke > command. > > server_args = -Rt0 /usr/sbin/rblsmtpd -r > e5guceki4ihryjerdfauwemb44.zen.dq.spamhaus.net /var/qmail/bin/relaylock > /usr/local/

Re: [spamdyke-users] Question about Greylisting and deleting Zero-Length-Entries

2011-11-01 Thread Peter Palmreuther
On 01.11.2011 at 12:03 t...@uncon.org wrote: > > Quoting Peter Palmreuther : >> I do exactly this (albeit with a self written script, because when I >> started to cleanup my graylisting directory I didn't know about >> 'qtp-prune-graylist'). >> Emp

Re: [spamdyke-users] Question about Greylisting and deleting Zero-Length-Entries

2011-10-10 Thread Peter Palmreuther
Hi, On 11.10.2011 at 00:19 Lutz Petersen wrote: > > Why are the 0-Byte-Files (no second connection comes in ever) laying around > in the same way as directories and used files ? Would'nt it make sense to > delete these empty greylisting files much more earlies than those diretories > or used f

Re: [spamdyke-users] Fwd: Spamdyke and smtp backup (in MX)

2011-07-10 Thread Peter Palmreuther
Hello, On 07/10/2011 at 11:29pm Carlos Herrera Polo wrote: > > -- Forwarded message -- > From: Carlos Herrera Polo > Date: Sun, 10 Jul 2011 16:25:59 -0500 > Subject: Spamdyke and smtp backup (in MX) > To: qmailtoaster-l...@qmailtoaster.com > > We need a second MX register en our

Re: [spamdyke-users] Filter $SENDER == $RECIPIENT

2010-01-17 Thread Peter Palmreuther
Hello, Eric Shubert wrote: > Peter Palmreuther wrote: [...] >> So here's the question: is there any chance to configure spamdyke >> rejecting mails with "$SENDER" == "$RECIPIENT" or even better with >> "DOMAIN($SENDER) in (RCPTHOSTS)" UNL

[spamdyke-users] Filter $SENDER == $RECIPIENT

2010-01-16 Thread Peter Palmreuther
SENDER) in (RCPTHOSTS)" UNLESS it's a authenticated SMTP connection? -- Thanks a lot, and best regards, Peter Palmreuther ___ spamdyke-users mailing list spamdyke-users@spamdyke.org http://www.spamdyke.org/mailman/listinfo/spamdyke-users