Re: [spamdyke-users] Qmail + spamdyke + chkuser

2009-09-07 Thread Youri V. Kravatsky
Hello Eric, Monday, September 7, 2009, 11:19:47 AM, you wrote: > Right, as it should be. All email from my domain *is* (at least should > be) sent through my server, where it is delivered locally. I can't > imagine why I would want to send email from my domain and to my domain > via any externa

Re: [spamdyke-users] Qmail + spamdyke + chkuser

2009-09-06 Thread Youri V. Kravatsky
Hello Eric, Saturday, September 5, 2009, 7:43:00 PM, you wrote: > The first test I sent to mys...@sub.mydomain.com. Interestingly enough, > it was rejected because I have @mydomain.com in my blacklist_senders > file. This is to prevent spamd where the sender address is spoofed with > my domain.

Re: [spamdyke-users] Qmail + spamdyke + chkuser

2009-09-05 Thread Youri V. Kravatsky
Hi, Eric! >>Well, how could I whitelist only ja-maica.ru without any subdomains? >> Right now whitelist.local has the following string >> @ja-maica.ru >> It seemed to me, that it makes only mail > You shouldn't need to whitelist ja-maica.ru, provided that it's in your > rcpthosts file. W

Re: [spamdyke-users] Qmail + spamdyke + chkuser

2009-09-05 Thread Youri V. Kravatsky
Hello Sam, Saturday, September 5, 2009, 10:11:03 PM, you wrote: > I can see why spamdyke is accepting messages to your subdomains -- > you've whitelisted the recipients. In the full log you sent, I see this line: > FILTER_RECIPIENT_WHITELIST recipient: kalugin...@www.ja-maica.ru > file:

Re: [spamdyke-users] Qmail + spamdyke + chkuser

2009-09-05 Thread Youri V. Kravatsky
Hello Eric, Saturday, September 5, 2009, 2:39:30 AM, you wrote: >>> What subdomains are you seeing besides @www. ? >> Subdomains of our domains. Mail that goes to domains that are not >> included to rcpthosts file is rejected. But mail to www.mydomain.com or >> mail.mydomain.com are accepted

Re: [spamdyke-users] Qmail + spamdyke + chkuser

2009-09-02 Thread Youri V. Kravatsky
Hello Eric, > chkuser is implemented via a patch to qmail. Well, BEFORE spamdyke adding, my chkuser was working perfectly (rejecting mails to non-existant and overquoting users). Now, as far as I understand, spamdyke injects received mails directly to qmail queue, or send them through local smtp,

Re: [spamdyke-users] Qmail + spamdyke + chkuser

2009-09-02 Thread Youri V. Kravatsky
Hello Sam, Wednesday, September 2, 2009, 12:05:59 AM, you wrote: > chkuser is just another filter that intercepts the data before qmail > sees it, so I don't see any reason it won't work with spamdyke. IIRC, > QmailToaster uses both chkuser and spamdyke. When chkuser rejects a > recipient, s

[spamdyke-users] Qmail + spamdyke + chkuser

2009-09-01 Thread Youri V. Kravatsky
Hello, people! :) Probably I've missed something, but there is any means to integrate qmail, spamdyke and chkuser (mine was with quotacheck)? I don't want to reinstall/replace qmail (well, 215 domains are hosted at this server). Right now all messages that have passed spam

Re: [spamdyke-users] spamdyke +ip-in-rdns-keyword-blacklist-entry option

2008-10-14 Thread Youri V. Kravatsky
Hello Sam, > BTW, spamdyke won't find a keyword like "dyn" in the middle of other > text like "dynamic". In order to match, a keyword must (1) be at the > beginning of the name, (2) be surrounded with non-alphanumeric > characters (i.e. dots or dashes) AND include the rDNS name's TLD (e.g. > "

Re: [spamdyke-users] spamdyke problem

2008-09-01 Thread Youri V. Kravatsky
Hello Sam, > I'm not sure I understand the issue here. Are you saying that when you > have "smtp-auth-level=always" authenticated users can send email but > unauthenticated users cannot? Then when you change to > "smtp-auth-level=ondemand" or "smtp-auth-level=observe" authenticated > users cann