ecompiling with excessive output and either
changing your log level to excessive or using the full-log-dir option
to capture a session (which will show the excessive output).
-- Sam Clippinger
On Jun 9, 2017, at 7:33 AM, turgut kalfaoğlu via spamdyke-users
mailto:spamdyke-users@spamdyke.or
hi there. I recently re-installed spamdyke and noticed that it's not
giving a response. I have it on port 1999 now for testing..
here is what happens..
$ telnet pluto.kalfaoglu.net 1999
Trying 176.9.64.42...
Connected to pluto.kalfaoglu.net.
Escape character is '^]'.
220 pluto.kalfaoglu.net ES
Hi there. I recently enabled spamdyke, but when someone uses the horde
webmail, they get an SMTP error 554..
Any ideas what to do?
Many thanks, -turgut
___
spamdyke-users mailing list
spamdyke-users@spamdyke.org
http://www.spamdyke.org/mailman/listi
Hi there.. I recently noticed in horror that a GUI change that I made
via PLESK 12 had removed my spamdyke from /etc/xinetd.d/smtp_psa
Upon reinstating:
server_args = -Rt0 /usr/local/bin/spamdyke
/var/qmail/bin/relaylock /usr/sbin/rblsmtpd -r bl.spamcop.net
/var/qmail/bin/qmail-smtpd /
Hello. On my new PLESK 12 server I'm having no luck either with qmail or
spamdyke accepting local mail.
Basically TELNET to port 25, or 587, and when I paste something like:
220 pluto.kalfaoglu.net ESMTP
HELO mail.kalfaoglu.net
MAIL FROM:
RCPT TO:
DATA
From: x...@kalfaoglu.net
To: a...@hotma
If you have no customers on that server, feel free.
Otherwise be very careful; I had a nightmare of a job going from plesk 9
to plesk 10.
It took over four days, of 24 hour shifts.
Regards,
-turgut
On 09/23/2014 06:56 PM, Shane Bywater wrote:
> Hi,
> I'm currently debating whether or not t
On 03/26/2013 09:15 PM, Eric Shubert wrote:
> Authenticated users pass all tests, so as long as your local users
> authenticate (and they should if they don't), you don't need to ease
> up any spamdyke rules for local users.
Thank you for your feedback.
I added the following to this new config
hi there. Many of the users who use our servers for SMTP use an
alternate port. So far I didn't have spamdyke running on that port (it
was only running port 25), but I just started it. I disabled many of
its checks, such as missing RDNS, as many of them do not have a reverse
DNS entry (telecom
I recently banned all of China from smtp_auth on my server.. No
complaints from legitimate customers so far -- China ranges are
available on the net.
fail2ban is great, use that too.. Perhaps connections-per-source
limiting from xinetd is also a good idea.. Good luck.. -t
On 09/02/2012 01:3
Btw, did anyone else notice it: If in an SMTP batch, one local user is
over quota or undeliverable, none of the other recipients gets a copy of
the mail?
Even for a mailing list.. One local recipient was over quota, no one got
a copy of postings until I cleared that user's quota..
-turgut
__
I had the same problem -- because someone from China is brute-forcing
all "info@..." accounts.. Once they find an easy password, they abuse
it with millions of spam..
- wrote code to check everyone's passwords for easyness (?) and forced
ppl to change their passwords -- or I changed it for them
On 01/09/2012 02:33 AM, Sam Clippinger wrote:
> But the sender's address always ends in "@facebook.com", right? The sender
> blacklist should still work.
I did not want to stop all mail from facebook - it was only that
combination "from facebook and recipient is someone on this system"
that I wa
seem to have that patch installed.
> It's a huge pain to recompile qmail with plesk's patches, plus the empf.. -t
>
> On 07.01.2012 18:02, Eric Shubert wrote:
>> On 01/07/2012 07:39 AM, turgut kalfaoğlu wrote:
>>> For some reason, we have massive amounts of
Btw, it's hopeless trying to contact Facebook over such issues.
God, I hate big companies with "free" services.
-turgut
On 01/07/2012 04:39 PM, turgut kalfaoğlu wrote:
> For some reason, we have massive amounts of mail coming from facebook,
> to one local user.
> I am un
For some reason, we have massive amounts of mail coming from facebook,
to one local user.
I am unable to stop it, because the From is different every time, there
are hundreds of users in the To: header,
and the local recipient is always one local poor guy.
I'm good at C programming and I'd like
Hi.. I seem to have a loop with facebook, the header containing hundreds
of emails..Anyway, I spotted that they are being rejected when I
installed the new version.. is this normal??
Jan 4 23:01:00 panel spamdyke[3047]: DENIED_RDNS_RESOLVE from:
rdar...@facebook.com to: cem.du...@totallojistik
Thank you, but these domains would like to be exempt from spamdyke for
their INCOMING mail.
Something like receiver-whitelist-file= option I guess..
-turgut
On 12/13/2011 04:50 PM, Eduard Svarc wrote:
spamdyke-users-boun...@spamdyke.org wrote on 13.12.2011 15:28:12:
> Some domains I host
Many thanks - I somehow failed to read or digest what you had
written.. *blush*
-turgut
On 12/09/2011 12:53 AM, Lutz Petersen wrote:
>>> Hi there. what is the correct format for the whitelist_senders file?
>>> I want to whitelist an entire domain with a borked DNS in the whitelist..
>>> Do I
Hello. How advanced is the pattern matching for whitelist_senders?
Can I write something like: shiptrade*@mobileemail.vodafone.gr and
hope that it gets understood to mean shiptrade1, shiptrade2, etc?
(An actual issue I have right now)
Thanks, -turgut
__
Hi there. what is the correct format for the whitelist_senders file?
I want to whitelist an entire domain with a borked DNS in the whitelist..
Do I do
*@abc.com
or just
abc.com
in this file?
Thanks
-t
___
spamdyke-users mailing list
spamdyke-u
Hello everyone.. I started using spamdyke on a plesk 9 shared hosting
server, and I'm very much impressed.
Before, spamassassin was killing itself trying to filter the stuff, now,
with some simple checks, mainly reverse DNS,
many of my headaches are gone! Now I practically get NO spam!
I just wa
21 matches
Mail list logo
