On 4/27/12 2:05 PM, Eric Shubert wrote:
> On 04/27/2012 10:54 AM, Gary Gendel wrote:
>
>> Since spamdyke runs on an unmodified qmail setup, it seems that a
>> good addition would early detection of non-existing users. This
>> will fix the backscatter problem that is inherent with qmail by
>> reje
Eric, Sam,
Thanks. I've just gone through a long postfix vs. qmail discussion on
the OpenIndiana forum. Bottom line is that spamdyke makes it impossible
for me personally to move to postfix. The only thing that the postfix
camp keeps harping about is backscatter emails. I may even have pull
I've been working on add this feature for quite a while now. I've never been
able to get it completely tested to my satisfaction, so I haven't released the
code yet.
http://www.spamdyke.org/documentation/FAQ.html#SUGGESTION5
-- Sam Clippinger
On Apr 27, 2012, at 12:54 PM, Gary Gende
On 04/27/2012 10:54 AM, Gary Gendel wrote:
> Since spamdyke runs on an unmodified qmail setup, it seems that a good
> addition would early detection of non-existing users. This will fix the
> backscatter problem that is inherent with qmail by rejecting email
> before queuing rather than bouncing t
Since spamdyke runs on an unmodified qmail setup, it seems that a good
addition would early detection of non-existing users. This will fix the
backscatter problem that is inherent with qmail by rejecting email
before queuing rather than bouncing them.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Backscatter_%
