Re: [spamdyke-users] Spamdyke problem 3.1.3

2008-01-13 Thread Sam Clippinger
This is a very tricky little bug. Looking at the code, I've only found one way it could occur. By the way, thanks for the strace output, that actually helped a lot. I think what's happening is this: the remote server is starting a TLS session with spamdyke (you have "tls-certificate-file" in

Re: [spamdyke-users] Spamdyke problem 3.1.3

2008-01-13 Thread frederic-spamdyke
Hi Sam ! Happy New Year ! Thanks for you great application spamdyke, I use it and works great. I suggest you an extension : I receive a lot of spam (less than i dont use spamdyke of course !) for multiples accounts on my own server and they have the same subject ... Maybe it is possible to detec

Re: [spamdyke-users] Spamdyke problem 3.1.3

2008-01-13 Thread paspao
Hello Sam, I have the remote server log ! 2008-01-11 09:18:39 1JDF67-0004SJ-5j <= <> R=1JDF66-0004SG-Cp U=Debian-exim P=local S=108258 2008-01-11 09:23:08 1JDF67-0004SJ-5j Spool file is locked (another process is handling this message) 2008-01-11 09:28:43 1JDF67-0004SJ-5j [EMAIL PROTECTED] T=rem

Re: [spamdyke-users] Spamdyke problem 3.1.3

2008-01-12 Thread Andrew Liles
Paolo, This is a long shot, but I have a similar problem at the moment that is NOT spamdyke but clamav (I notice you use clamav). I use spamdyke to front qmail, but via qmail-scanner control is passed to clamav before the proper qmail-smtp processing starts. I have encountered two emails th

Re: [spamdyke-users] Spamdyke problem 3.1.3

2008-01-11 Thread paspao
Thank you Sam, I'm still thinking about it, I'll try to give you more details. The problem was originated by a message with attachments, not big 108820 bytes. The original message was sent on 11/01/07 at 9:22 and was bounced for user unknown error. The bounced message reports: -- This is a co

Re: [spamdyke-users] Spamdyke problem 3.1.3

2008-01-11 Thread Pablo Gonzalez
Thanks Sam, We will be attentive to your report. Best regards, Pablo González A. On 11/01/2008, Sam Clippinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Thanks for reporting this! I'll take a look and see if I can find an > explanation. > > -- Sam Clippinger > > Paolo wrote: > > Hello , > > > > just tod

Re: [spamdyke-users] Spamdyke problem 3.1.3

2008-01-11 Thread Sam Clippinger
Thanks for reporting this! I'll take a look and see if I can find an explanation. -- Sam Clippinger Paolo wrote: > Hello , > > just today I had a similar problem, 1 spamdyke process at 100% , then > I killed it and it happened another couple of times. > > The logs does not shows any error >

Re: [spamdyke-users] Spamdyke problem 3.1.3

2008-01-11 Thread Paolo
Hello, Please help ! I even tried disabling simscan from tcp.smtp so the message arrive without any scanning I added the sending smtp to spamdyke ip-whitelist That mail continues to hang spamdyke process , I really have to solve this problem ! Thank you Ciao Paolo

Re: [spamdyke-users] Spamdyke problem 3.1.3

2008-01-11 Thread Paolo
Hello, I made a strace of the hanging process: strace -f -p 17369 Process 17369 attached - interrupt to quit waitpid(17370, NULL, WNOHANG) = -1 ECHILD (No child processes) time(NULL) = 1200050989 waitpid(17370, NULL, WNOHANG) = -1 ECHILD (No child

Re: [spamdyke-users] Spamdyke problem 3.1.3

2008-01-11 Thread Paolo
Hello, I made a strace of the hanging process: strace -f -p 17369 Process 17369 attached - interrupt to quit waitpid(17370, NULL, WNOHANG) = -1 ECHILD (No child processes) time(NULL) = 1200050989 waitpid(17370, NULL, WNOHANG) = -1 ECHILD (No child

Re: [spamdyke-users] Spamdyke problem 3.1.3

2008-01-11 Thread Paolo
Hello , just today I had a similar problem, 1 spamdyke process at 100% , then I killed it and it happened another couple of times. The logs does not shows any error It happens every time it tries to deliver a specific bounced message (caused by a normal user unknown ) to one user . So every

[spamdyke-users] Spamdyke problem 3.1.3

2008-01-10 Thread Pablo Gonzalez
Spamdyke problem 3.1.3 Hi guys, I have my installation of qmail based qmailrocks centos 5 + and have the problem that there is a process that calls vpopmail spamdyke which remains stuck at 100% while maintaining the use of processor, increasing the load average on my server Any ideas? Thanks Pa