On Fri, Feb 04, 2005 at 04:40:27PM -0600, Tom 'spot' Callaway wrote:
Resending, since I think Evolution ate it. Apologies if this shows up twice.
With a working pte_read, and VMALLOC_START set sanely, the next major
bug that Aurora users have noticed is that Xorg does not work on sparc32
On Fri, 2005-02-04 at 17:15 -0800, William Lee Irwin III wrote:
On Fri, Feb 04, 2005 at 04:40:27PM -0600, Tom 'spot' Callaway wrote:
Resending, since I think Evolution ate it. Apologies if this shows up twice.
With a working pte_read, and VMALLOC_START set sanely, the next major
bug that
On Fri, 04 Feb 2005 22:04:38 -0600
Bob Breuer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I suppose the idea of creating stubs for the missing prom
functions on sparc64 has already been considered and rejected.
Actually, this sounds like a nice cleanup idea. It just hasn't
been done.
Anyway, for this bug with
On Fri, 04 Feb 2005 16:40:27 -0600
Tom 'spot' Callaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My SS20 with a CG6 (TGX+) works fine in 2.4. When I attempt to run Xorg
in 2.6 (specifically, 2.6.11-rc2-bk3), the Xorg.0.log claims that it is
running, but the kernel has actually oopsed:
Removing the if
