Re: [2.6 patch] sparc: "extern inline" -> "static inline"

2005-09-02 Thread David S. Miller
From: Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Fri, 2 Sep 2005 22:24:44 +0200 > "extern inline" doesn't make much sense. > > Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Patch does not apply to Linus's current tree, every change in include/asm-sparc/spinlock.h was rejected. - To unsubscribe from t

[2.6 patch] sparc: "extern inline" -> "static inline"

2005-09-02 Thread Adrian Bunk
"extern inline" doesn't make much sense. Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- arch/sparc/kernel/time.c |2 +- arch/sparc/mm/srmmu.c |2 +- include/asm-sparc/btfixup.h | 12 ++-- include/asm-sparc/cache.h | 18 +- include/asm-

Re: Very beautiful amateur girls and posing nude

2005-09-02 Thread David Johnson
Could people please report this spam at the address below. Not only is sending spam against the code of practice every UK premium rate phone number operator must agree to, it is now also illegal under UK law. http://www.icstis.org.uk/ Thanks, David. -- David Johnson www.david-web.co.uk - My P