Re: Third Try: [PATCH] cs4231 alsa driver: Fix IRQ and initialisation problems, reduce period_bytes_min

2007-01-03 Thread David Miller
From: "Chini, Georg" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Wed, 03 Jan 2007 19:32:57 +0100 > Georg Chini wrote: > > > > > David Miller wrote: > > > >> But it seems that nowadays the ISA CS4231 driver is using a value of > >> "64" for period_bytes_min. Perhaps the Sparc driver should do that > >> too :-) > >

2.6.20-rc3: known unfixed regressions (v2)

2007-01-03 Thread Adrian Bunk
This email lists some known regressions in 2.6.20-rc3 compared to 2.6.19 that are not yet fixed in Linus' tree. If you find your name in the Cc header, you are either submitter of one of the bugs, maintainer of an affectected subsystem or driver, a patch of you caused a breakage or I'm considering

Re: Third Try: [PATCH] cs4231 alsa driver: Fix IRQ and initialisation problems, reduce period_bytes_min

2007-01-03 Thread Chini, Georg
Georg Chini wrote: David Miller wrote: But it seems that nowadays the ISA CS4231 driver is using a value of "64" for period_bytes_min. Perhaps the Sparc driver should do that too :-) My machine seems too slow to handle this. With values less than 256 sound will not work properly. I thi

Re: Third Try: [PATCH] cs4231 alsa driver: Fix IRQ and initialisation problems, reduce period_bytes_min

2007-01-03 Thread Georg Chini
David Miller wrote: But it seems that nowadays the ISA CS4231 driver is using a value of "64" for period_bytes_min. Perhaps the Sparc driver should do that too :-) My machine seems too slow to handle this. With values less than 256 sound will not work properly. I think it starts missing