Re: libhugetlbfs and sparc64 support

2007-03-12 Thread David Miller
From: Nishanth Aravamudan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2007 14:12:40 -0700 > On 12.03.2007 [13:40:28 -0700], David Miller wrote: > > I'll try to take a look at this, thanks. > > Really appreciated. This patch below seems to improve the situation for me on my SunBlade1500, let me know if

Re: [Systems] Re: Oops in tcp_sendmsg on T[12]000

2007-03-12 Thread David Miller
From: Narayan Newton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2007 16:58:56 -0700 > I have been working on the same server/issue as Mike. We have found that > our kernel without Netfilter support does not have this issue, but the > moment you enable it in the kernel config this bug is triggered. > At

Re: [Systems] Re: Oops in tcp_sendmsg on T[12]000

2007-03-12 Thread Narayan Newton
Hi, I have been working on the same server/issue as Mike. We have found that our kernel without Netfilter support does not have this issue, but the moment you enable it in the kernel config this bug is triggered. Attached are the two kernel configs. The only difference is CONFIG_NETFILTER=y Kerne

Re: libhugetlbfs and sparc64 support

2007-03-12 Thread Nishanth Aravamudan
On 12.03.2007 [13:40:28 -0700], David Miller wrote: > From: Nishanth Aravamudan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2007 11:39:20 -0700 > > > *** > > Warning: Your file, libhugetlbfs-sparc64.tar.bz2, contains more than 32 > > files after decompression and cannot be scanned

Re: libhugetlbfs and sparc64 support

2007-03-12 Thread David Miller
From: Nishanth Aravamudan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2007 11:39:20 -0700 > *** > Warning: Your file, libhugetlbfs-sparc64.tar.bz2, contains more than 32 files > after decompression and cannot be scanned. > *** What is it with these extremely stu

Re: Sunfire v880

2007-03-12 Thread Alex Deucher
On 3/8/07, David Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: From: "Alex Deucher" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Thu, 8 Mar 2007 16:58:12 -0500 > Thanks for all your help with this. I wish I could send you a v880. > If there's anything else you or anyone else would like me to try let > me know. One last thin

Re: Dead lock with 2.6.20

2007-03-12 Thread BERTRAND Joël
Daniel Smolik a écrit : BERTRAND Joël napsal(a): Daniel Smolik a écrit : BERTRAND Joël napsal(a): Hello, I have seen a very strange deadlock on a UltraSPARC 2 workstation (2 UltraSPARC-II/296 MHz, 2048 MB, framebuffer Creator3D on UPA slot, 2 73 GB SCA disks that form a raid1 arra