Re: [1/2] 2.6.22-rc7: known regressions

2007-07-05 Thread Dmitry Torokhov
On 7/5/07, Linus Torvalds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Looks input-related.. On Thu, 5 Jul 2007, David Woodhouse wrote: > > Hm, it's not something new. It's an oops I saw occasionally in 2.6.21-rc > too, whenever we had CONFIG_SYSFS_DEPRECATED set. > > Unable to handle kernel paging request for

Re: [1/2] 2.6.22-rc7: known regressions

2007-07-05 Thread Linus Torvalds
Looks input-related.. On Thu, 5 Jul 2007, David Woodhouse wrote: > > Hm, it's not something new. It's an oops I saw occasionally in 2.6.21-rc > too, whenever we had CONFIG_SYSFS_DEPRECATED set. > > Unable to handle kernel paging request for data at address 0x6b6b6b6b Ok, that 0x6b is obviousl

Re: [1/2] 2.6.22-rc7: known regressions

2007-07-05 Thread David Woodhouse
On Thu, 2007-07-05 at 14:46 -0400, David Woodhouse wrote: > Oh, I suck. I failed to noticed that it had oopsed earlier, in slab > debugging. I shall look at my 'obviously correct' slab patch a little > harder, now that I'm not distracted by the fireworks. Hm, it's not something new. It's an oops I

Re: [1/2] 2.6.22-rc7: known regressions

2007-07-05 Thread David Woodhouse
On Thu, 2007-07-05 at 09:28 -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > On Wed, 4 Jul 2007, David Woodhouse wrote: > > > > Oh, and here's another one for you. My Bluetooth mouse just stopped > > working and hidd is deadlocked... > > Looks like it is stuck on hidp_session_sem. Oh, I suck. I failed to notic

Re: [1/2] 2.6.22-rc7: known regressions

2007-07-05 Thread David Woodhouse
On Thu, 2007-07-05 at 09:28 -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > On Wed, 4 Jul 2007, David Woodhouse wrote: > > > > Oh, and here's another one for you. My Bluetooth mouse just stopped > > working and hidd is deadlocked... > > Looks like it is stuck on hidp_session_sem. > > Nothing after 2.6.21 seem

Re: [1/2] 2.6.22-rc7: known regressions

2007-07-05 Thread Linus Torvalds
On Wed, 4 Jul 2007, David Woodhouse wrote: > > Oh, and here's another one for you. My Bluetooth mouse just stopped > working and hidd is deadlocked... Looks like it is stuck on hidp_session_sem. Nothing after 2.6.21 seems to have even touched that semaphore usage, and in fact there's not a wh

Re: dead(?) CONFIG vars

2007-07-05 Thread Geert Uytterhoeven
Hi Robert, On Thu, 5 Jul 2007, Robert P. J. Day wrote: > == AP1000 == > arch/m68k/sun3/prom/printf.c:40:#ifdef CONFIG_AP1000 > arch/m68k/sun3/prom/init.c:34:#ifdef CONFIG_AP1000 The AP1000 was actually a SPARC system (cluster). The only reason these tests ended up in arch/

Re: dead(?) CONFIG vars

2007-07-05 Thread Geert Uytterhoeven
Hi Robert, On Thu, 5 Jul 2007, Robert P. J. Day wrote: > On Thu, 5 Jul 2007, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > > On Thu, 5 Jul 2007, Robert P. J. Day wrote: > > > == AP1000 == > > > arch/m68k/sun3/prom/printf.c:40:#ifdef CONFIG_AP1000 > > > arch/m68k/sun3/prom/init.c:34:#ifdef CO

Re: dead(?) CONFIG vars

2007-07-05 Thread Robert P. J. Day
On Thu, 5 Jul 2007, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > Hi Robert, > > On Thu, 5 Jul 2007, Robert P. J. Day wrote: > > == AP1000 == > > arch/m68k/sun3/prom/printf.c:40:#ifdef CONFIG_AP1000 > > arch/m68k/sun3/prom/init.c:34:#ifdef CONFIG_AP1000 > > The AP1000 was actually a SPARC syst