On Wed, 2008-02-20 at 15:02 +0100, Florian Fainelli wrote:
Hi all,
Are there any public E10k porting efforts ? There is currently no
hardware driver for the serial console, and I read that people from
RedHat are working on it.
I could also arrange accounts on the SSP machine if people
Hi all,
Are there any public E10k porting efforts ? There is currently no
hardware driver for the serial console, and I read that people from
RedHat are working on it.
I could also arrange accounts on the SSP machine if people are
interested in working on this Sparc port.
Thank you very
Hi David.
I was looking into the few remaining section mismatch
warnings on sparc64 (with my previous posted patchset applied).
This is more an RFC than a real patch submission.
Can you try to look through my mumblings and see if anything makes sense.
The ones I have is:
WARNING:
David Miller writes:
I'm ambivalent but I would obviously prefer 2.6.25 because
it would allow me to proceed more easily with my sparc64
NUMA work as well as get your bug fixes in more smoothly.
Sounds like we should get Stephen to put it in linux-next-stable once
we're convinced it's all OK.
On Thu, 21 Feb 2008 13:15:58 +1100
Paul Mackerras [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Kumar Gala writes:
np. Are we trying to get this into 2.6.25 or .26?
I was going to put it into my powerpc-next branch and put it in
2.6.26. I don't see any need for it to go in 2.6.25.
Is that a new branch
From: Sam Ravnborg [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2008 22:50:20 +0100
Full diff of the included changes below.
If you can use this in part or in toal they have my:
Signed-off-by: Sam Ravnborg [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Looks good, applied. Yes, this stuff is all only user past
__init time if
