Re: [Linux-fbdev-devel] Re: [atyfb] No display on Sparc Ultra 10 with kernel 2.6.10-rc2 or later

2005-02-17 Thread Antonino A. Daplas
On Thursday 17 February 2005 22:16, Frans Pop wrote: > On Thursday 17 February 2005 00:24, Antonino A. Daplas wrote: > > > Try this patch and let me know. > > > > > > video=atyfb:comp_sync:,vert_sync:,hor_sync: > > > > > > n = 0 (low), 1 (high)

Re: [atyfb] No display on Sparc Ultra 10 with kernel 2.6.10-rc2 or later

2005-02-16 Thread Antonino A. Daplas
On Thursday 17 February 2005 07:02, Antonino A. Daplas wrote: > On Thursday 17 February 2005 06:10, Frans Pop wrote: > > On Wednesday 16 February 2005 16:51, David S. Miller wrote: > > > On Wed, 16 Feb 2005 19:27:57 +0800 Antonino A. Daplas wrote: > > > > Nope, t

Re: [Linux-fbdev-devel] Re: [atyfb] No display on Sparc Ultra 10 with kernel 2.6.10-rc2 or later

2005-02-16 Thread Antonino A. Daplas
On Thursday 17 February 2005 07:02, Antonino A. Daplas wrote: > On Thursday 17 February 2005 06:10, Frans Pop wrote: > > On Wednesday 16 February 2005 16:51, David S. Miller wrote: > > > On Wed, 16 Feb 2005 19:27:57 +0800 Antonino A. Daplas wrote: > > > > Nope, t

Re: [atyfb] No display on Sparc Ultra 10 with kernel 2.6.10-rc2 or later

2005-02-16 Thread Antonino A. Daplas
On Thursday 17 February 2005 06:10, Frans Pop wrote: > On Wednesday 16 February 2005 16:51, David S. Miller wrote: > > On Wed, 16 Feb 2005 19:27:57 +0800 Antonino A. Daplas wrote: > > > Nope, those are proposed options. If nobody disagrees, I can easily > > > add this f

Re: [atyfb] No display on Sparc Ultra 10 with kernel 2.6.10-rc2 or later

2005-02-16 Thread Antonino A. Daplas
On Wednesday 16 February 2005 11:20, David S. Miller wrote: > On Wed, 16 Feb 2005 03:27:51 +0100 > > Frans Pop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Excellent! > > Tested the patch with 2.6.11-rc3-bk2 and AFAICT it completely restores > > the old behavior. I guess that solves the regression since 2.6.10-r

Re: [atyfb] No display on Sparc Ultra 10 with kernel 2.6.10-rc2 or later

2005-02-16 Thread Antonino A. Daplas
On Wednesday 16 February 2005 10:27, Frans Pop wrote: > On Tuesday 15 February 2005 13:10, Antonino A. Daplas wrote: > > Can you verify if this is the case? Insert a bunch of printk's in and > > around this line "if (node == pcp->prom_node) {" in > > aty

Re: [atyfb] No display on Sparc Ultra 10 with kernel 2.6.10-rc2 or later

2005-02-15 Thread Antonino A. Daplas
On Tuesday 15 February 2005 14:22, Frans Pop wrote: > Hi Tony, > > I've tried your suggestions and the one about using fbset resulted in a > breakthrough. 'fbset -depth' gave no results, but comparing the output of > 'fbset -i' from a working kernel and a new one gave me something to try. > Okay.

Re: [atyfb] No display on Sparc Ultra 10 with kernel 2.6.10-rc2 or later

2005-02-14 Thread Antonino A. Daplas
On Tuesday 15 February 2005 01:55, Frans Pop wrote: > Hello Tony, > > Thanks for your reaction. > > On Monday 14 February 2005 17:59, Antonino A. Daplas wrote: > > The above timings are screwed. This is 1024x768 at 85Hz INTERLACED. > > The fb_find_mode() function p

Re: [atyfb] No display on Sparc Ultra 10 with kernel 2.6.10-rc2 or later

2005-02-14 Thread Antonino A. Daplas
On Monday 14 February 2005 23:34, Frans Pop wrote: > On Monday 14 February 2005 12:32, Ben Collins wrote: > atyfb: Set Visible Mode to 1024x768-8 > atyfb: Virtual resolution 1024x2016, pixclock_in_ps 22349 (calculated > 22349) atyfb: Dot clock: 44 MHz > atyfb: Horizontal sync: 35