Re: [2.6.20.3] Oops with syscall_is_too_hard...

2007-03-20 Thread mt1
On Tue, Mar 20, 2007 at 04:28:54PM -0500, Tom spot Callaway wrote: > On Tue, 2007-03-20 at 19:52 +0100, BERTRAND =?utf-8?Q?Jo=EBl?= wrote: > > Hello, > > > > I have tried to untar the sources of 2.6.21-rc4 kernel. My SS20 runs > > with > > 2.6.20.3/SMP. > > As Dave has recently point

Re: [2.6.20.3] Oops with syscall_is_too_hard...

2007-03-20 Thread Tom \"spot\" Callaway
On Tue, 2007-03-20 at 19:52 +0100, BERTRAND =?utf-8?Q?Jo=EBl?= wrote: > Hello, > > I have tried to untar the sources of 2.6.21-rc4 kernel. My SS20 runs > with > 2.6.20.3/SMP. As Dave has recently pointed out, sparc32 is unmaintained. sparc32 SMP is known to be broken. And bug r

[2.6.20.3] Oops with syscall_is_too_hard...

2007-03-20 Thread BERTRAND Jo
Hello, I have tried to untar the sources of 2.6.21-rc4 kernel. My SS20 runs with 2.6.20.3/SMP. [/usr/src] > tar xvfj linux-2.6.21-rc4.tar.bz2 ends with: ble to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference tsk->{mm,active_mm}->context = 0c70 tsk->{mm,active_mm}->pg