Hello,
Got this when doing usual looping over /proc entries on fresh test
kernel:
What is the usual looping, please?
#!/bin/bash
for i in `find /proc -type f`; do
echo -n cat $i /dev/null ... ;
( cat $i /dev/null );
echo done;
done
OK,
On Tue, 8 Jan 2008 19:42:16 +0100 Mariusz Kozlowski wrote:
Hello,
Got this when doing usual looping over /proc entries on fresh test
kernel:
What is the usual looping, please?
---
~Randy
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe sparclinux in
the body of a message
Hello,
Got this when doing usual looping over /proc entries on fresh test
kernel:
What is the usual looping, please?
#!/bin/bash
for i in `find /proc -type f`; do
echo -n cat $i /dev/null ... ;
( cat $i /dev/null );
echo done;
done
Regards,
Mariusz Kozlowski wrote:
Hello,
Got this when doing usual looping over /proc entries on fresh test
kernel:
What is the usual looping, please?
#!/bin/bash
for i in `find /proc -type f`; do
echo -n cat $i /dev/null ... ;
( cat $i /dev/null );
echo done;
From: Mariusz Kozlowski [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2008 19:42:16 +0100
Hello,
Got this when doing usual looping over /proc entries on fresh test
kernel:
WARNING: at kernel/lockdep_proc.c:267 lockdep_stats_show()
Call Trace:
[00492704]
* David Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
WARNING: at kernel/lockdep_proc.c:267 lockdep_stats_show()
Call Trace:
[00492704] lockdep_stats_show+0x6ac/0x6c0
[004eb4b4] seq_read+0x5c/0x340
[0050b2bc] proc_reg_read+0x64/0xa0
[004cd72c]
From: Ingo Molnar [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2008 23:56:31 +0100
is this anything the core lockdep code could help improve? Let us know
if any aspect is hindering you.
No, it's a sparc64 issue.
Another problem I ran into are the huge static table sizes
lockdep uses. They really need
* David Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Ingo Molnar [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2008 23:56:31 +0100
is this anything the core lockdep code could help improve? Let us know
if any aspect is hindering you.
No, it's a sparc64 issue.
Another problem I ran into are the huge
