From: "jiaqi zhang" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tue, 7 Aug 2007 13:34:22 +1200
> Do you mean retrieving the instruction from tpc in sigcontext?
Yep.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe sparclinux" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://v
Do you mean retrieving the instruction from tpc in sigcontext?
Thanks a lot. I'll try it.
On 8/7/07, David Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> From: "jiaqi zhang" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Tue, 7 Aug 2007 10:41:18 +1200
>
> > While I could find the faultive address in siginfo_t, it seems there
>
From: "jiaqi zhang" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tue, 7 Aug 2007 10:41:18 +1200
> While I could find the faultive address in siginfo_t, it seems there
> is no way to find the access type(read or write) in it.
Disassemble the instruction and see if it is a load or a store.
Even if the information is
Hello everyone,
I'm working on a project that needs to deal with SIGSEGV on SPARC64.
While I could find the faultive address in siginfo_t, it seems there
is no way to find the access type(read or write) in it. I tracked the
kernel source and found that ther kernel retrieves this information
(fault
