Dear David, 

Thank you for providing your suggestions. I implemented your advice by 
including all variable modifications in the search, and the warning 
messages did not appear. 

I appreciate your assistance.

Sincerely,
Longping

在2023年11月17日星期五 UTC-5 20:49:25<David Shteynberg> 写道:

> Thanks Longping, I got your files.
>
> On Nov 17, 2023, at 5:21 PM, Longping Fu <lpf...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Dear David,
>
> I appreciate your swift response. I've compressed the pepXML and mzML 
> files and uploaded them to Google Drive. You can access them through the 
> following link: 
> https://drive.google.com/file/d/1P463uxdvw67ZI7axiZO1OZOIlEZZg5qh/view?usp=sharing
>
> Kindly confirm if you can successfully open the files.
>
> Additionally, I'll be following your suggestion to include all variable 
> modifications and check for any remaining warning messages.
>
> Thank you for your assistance.
>
> Sincerely,
> Longping
>
> 在2023年11月17日星期五 UTC-5 16:20:11<David Shteynberg> 写道:
>
> Dear Longping,
>
> Maybe you can compress your analysis pepXML and mzML files and post them 
> somewhere so I can replicate the issue locally?
>
> Meanwhile, you can try the specifying all variable mods used in the 
> search, when you run PTMProphet by changing the modification string as 
> follows:
>  M:15.9949,n:42.1016,STC:299.123,C:57.02146
>
>
> Cheers!
>
> -David
>
>
>
>
> On Fri, Nov 17, 2023 at 1:02 PM Longping Fu <lpf...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> I am currently working with PTMProphet in TPP version 6.3.3 for PTM 
> localization. While PTMProphet successfully completes the task, I am 
> encountering a significant number of warning messages in the console.
>
> To provide some context, my workflow involves utilizing MSFragger as the 
> search engine to convert raw files to mzML files and then searching against 
> a database. For the modification parameters, I have set M 15.9949, N-term 
> 42.1016, STC 299.123, and C 57.02146 as variable modifications, with no 
> fixed modifications specified.
>
> Upon obtaining the pepXML file from MSFragger, I employed Percolator for 
> PSM validation using the following settings: *--only-psms --no-terminate 
> --post-processing-tdc*. The resulting pepxml file was then processed with 
> PTMProphet using the command: *STC:299.123 MINPROB=0.5 MODPREC=0 
> FRAGPPMTOL=15 NOSTACK MAXTHREADS=1*. 
>
> However, during the PTMProphet processing, I encountered warning messages 
> similar to the following:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> *[WARNING:] Illegal PTM-shuffled peptide detected with non-matching mass: 
> S[386]CNGGSHPR Neutral Mass (from pepXML) = 1254.52 BAD 
> (SpectraST::Peptide) = S[386]CNGGSHPR Neutral Computed Mass for Evaluation 
> = 1212.51 PPM difference = 33487.5[INFO:] please check your specified 
> modification masses for precision or adjust MODPREC= parameter 
> ...[WARNING:] Illegal PTM-shuffled peptide detected with non-matching mass: 
> SC[402]NGGSHPR Neutral Mass (from pepXML) = 1254.52 BAD 
> (SpectraST::Peptide) = SC[402]NGGSHPR Neutral Computed Mass for Evaluation 
> = 1212.51 PPM difference = 33487.5[INFO:] please check your specified 
> modification masses for precision or adjust MODPREC= parameter 
> ...[WARNING:] Illegal PTM-shuffled peptide detected with non-matching mass: 
> SCNGGS[386]HPR Neutral Mass (from pepXML) = 1254.52 BAD 
> (SpectraST::Peptide) = SCNGGS[386]HPR Neutral Computed Mass for Evaluation 
> = 1212.51 PPM difference = 33487.5[INFO:] please check your specified 
> modification masses for precision or adjust MODPREC= parameter ...*
>
> This pattern repeats for various peptides, indicating that PTMProphet is 
> struggling to localize modifications on S, T, or C. The tool suggests 
> adjusting parameters, specifically the MODPREC= parameter.
>
> Has anyone encountered a similar issue with PTMProphet and successfully 
> addressed it? I would greatly appreciate any insights, advice, or 
> suggestions regarding this matter.
>
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "spctools-discuss" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to spctools-discu...@googlegroups.com.
> To view this discussion on the web visit 
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/spctools-discuss/ae1adab3-5501-4f29-b9d2-44d6252e7e84n%40googlegroups.com
>  
> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/spctools-discuss/ae1adab3-5501-4f29-b9d2-44d6252e7e84n%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
> .
>
>
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "spctools-discuss" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to spctools-discu...@googlegroups.com.
>
> To view this discussion on the web visit 
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/spctools-discuss/27485be2-f0b5-411e-a4e7-13cc49e588d5n%40googlegroups.com
>  
> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/spctools-discuss/27485be2-f0b5-411e-a4e7-13cc49e588d5n%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
> .
>
>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"spctools-discuss" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to spctools-discuss+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/spctools-discuss/6cbf03eb-374e-4f87-a255-5f642f548960n%40googlegroups.com.

Reply via email to