Re: [spctools-discuss] protein validation

2023-05-05 Thread felipe velasquez
Dear Jimmy Thanks for your reply. I will use the correct database. Felipe El jue, 4 may 2023 a las 15:30, Jimmy Eng () escribió: > Felipe, > > You should not search sequence databases composed of just a single protein > or even tens of proteins and hope to process them through downstream >

Re: [spctools-discuss] protein validation

2023-05-04 Thread Jimmy Eng
Felipe, You should not search sequence databases composed of just a single protein or even tens of proteins and hope to process them through downstream validation tools like the Prophets. When you do this, you break lots of assumptions that the tools expect which makes the results, like

Re: [spctools-discuss] protein validation

2023-05-03 Thread felipe velasquez
Hello Luis Thanks for your request. Yes, I performed TPP/Prophets, and their probability is high as 0.9 or 1, in many peptides. The database I used only contains my protein of interest in FASTA. I do not know how to use decoys. Kind regards, Felipe El mar, 2 may 2023 a las 22:53, 'Luis

Re: [spctools-discuss] protein validation

2023-05-02 Thread 'Luis Mendoza' via spctools-discuss
Hello Felipe, There may be several reasons why you see the viral protein in your analysis, e.g. - Did you only run Comet, or did you validate using the TPP/Prophets? If the latter, what was the probability of the protein(s) in question? - What were the contents of the database that you

[spctools-discuss] protein validation

2023-04-30 Thread felipe velasquez
Hello I have a question about protein validation. I am trying to use TPP to identify post-translational modifications of certain proteins. I performed a Comet search using the sequence of my protein of interest. However, while exploring another database, I performed a search using a protein that