Hi All,
Wind River just released SPDX 1.2 support for its free SPDX file creation cloud
server.
Here is what's new:
* Supports newly released SPDX 1.2 format.
* Improved Analysis Quality - Added several new license detector agents
to improve expert system analysis engine.
*
Hi All!
Thanks to Paul Madick for running the last legal team meeting while I was gone.
Meeting minutes have been posted here:
http://wiki.spdx.org/view/Legal_Team/Minutes/2013-10-24
For tomorrow's call, it will follow a similar pattern in terms of updates on
the following topics:
1) License
Jilayne Lovejoy wrote at 14:39 (EST) on Tuesday:
> If I understand correctly then, there really isn't a need for a short
> identifier for AGPLv2 because it doesn't exist as a individual license
> in the sense that it simply allows something under AGPLv1 to be
> licensed under AGPLv3
...
> (which, a
Hi Bob,
Yes, this is an issue! In looking more closely at the Ruby license, we also
realized that the text has varied over the years as well. (see some of
discussion captured here:
http://wiki.spdx.org/view/Legal_Team/Minutes/2013-09-12 ) The solution for
v1.19 (released last month) of the
Hi Bob,
In short, the answer is that there are actually three different variations of
Artistic 1.0, as follows:
- the one on OSI site with clause 8
- the one on OSI site without clause 8
- the one on the Perl site
After conferring with the OSI on how to deal with this for purposes of the SPDX
L
I added some notes as well, but I think I colored outside the green lines… :)
I also added a column regarding the short identifiers to indicate when they are
different from Fedora's. This is a key part of this task; that is, to track
where they are different (which is inevitable) so that some
Hi Legal Group,
I added a few comments on the latest green-highlighted group on the Fedora
list. These are pretty obscure! Looking forward to other comments.
Regards,
Dennis Clark
nexB, Inc.
On Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 4:22 PM, wrote:
> Thank you to everyone who participated in the review of t
